Gray Television, Inc.
Gray Television, Inc. GTN-A Peers
See (GTN-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN-A | $10.89 | +6.56% | 628.8M | 4.65 | $2.34 | +6.59% |
| CCZ | $61.10 | +0.00% | 57.9B | 52.13 | $1.17 | +3.56% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $17.13 | +1.18% | 2.7B | 6.05 | $2.83 | +2.92% |
| NMAX | $14.35 | +4.44% | 1.3B | -39.78 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| FUBO | $3.65 | -3.05% | 1.2B | 18.20 | $0.20 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.87 | +4.96% | 448.1M | 2.08 | $2.34 | +6.59% |
| CURI | $4.88 | -4.41% | 281.3M | -34.82 | -$0.14 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
GTN-A vs CCZ Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while CCZ trades at $61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs LSXMA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs LSXMK Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs LSXMB Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs TGNA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while TGNA trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs NMAX Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while NMAX trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -39.78. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs FUBO Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while FUBO trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs GTN Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while GTN trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs CURI Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 281.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while CURI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SSP Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while SSP trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs IHRT Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while IHRT trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs EVC Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while EVC trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SGA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while SGA trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs MDIA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while MDIA trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs UONE Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while UONE trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs UONEK Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while UONEK trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SJ Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while SJ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SALM Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while SALM trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs AUD Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs XHLD Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while XHLD trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs BBGI Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while BBGI trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs CURIW Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while CURIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs CMLS Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while CMLS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs DISCA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs QVCD Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while QVCD trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs QVCC Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 628.8M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.89, while QVCC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.