Gray Media, Inc.
Gray Media, Inc. (GTN-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTN-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN-A | $10.72 | -1.56% | 573.4M | -7.17 | -$1.41 | +6.93% |
| CCZ | $62.64 | -1.62% | 15.6B | 53.45 | $1.17 | +2.88% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.46 | +0.79% | 3.3B | 15.29 | $1.34 | +2.44% |
| NMAX | $6.96 | -1.00% | 627.4M | -8.12 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| SSP | $3.88 | -2.27% | 457.9M | -2.07 | -$1.87 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.62 | -0.11% | 431.3M | -3.27 | -$1.41 | +6.93% |
| FUBO | $1.17 | -1.68% | 414.4M | 3.67 | $0.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GTN-A vs CCZ Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while CCZ trades at $62.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A and CCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCZ's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMA Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMA's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMK Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMK's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMB Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMB's competition here
GTN-A vs TGNA Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while TGNA trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check TGNA's competition here
GTN-A vs NMAX Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while NMAX trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check NMAX's competition here
GTN-A vs SSP Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while SSP trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SSP's competition here
GTN-A vs GTN Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while GTN trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check GTN's competition here
GTN-A vs FUBO Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while FUBO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check FUBO's competition here
GTN-A vs IHRT Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while IHRT trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check IHRT's competition here
GTN-A vs EVC Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while EVC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check EVC's competition here
GTN-A vs CURI Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while CURI trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -32.90. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CURI's competition here
GTN-A vs SGA Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while SGA trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 226.20. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SGA's competition here
GTN-A vs SJ Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while SJ trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SJ's competition here
GTN-A vs MDIA Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while MDIA trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check MDIA's competition here
GTN-A vs UONEK Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while UONEK trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check UONEK's competition here
GTN-A vs UONE Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while UONE trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check UONE's competition here
GTN-A vs AUD Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check AUD's competition here
GTN-A vs SALM Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while SALM trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SALM's competition here
GTN-A vs BBGI Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while BBGI trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check BBGI's competition here
GTN-A vs XHLD Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while XHLD trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check XHLD's competition here
GTN-A vs CURIW Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A and CURIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CURIW's competition here
GTN-A vs CMLS Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 94.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while CMLS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CMLS's competition here
GTN-A vs DISCA Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check DISCA's competition here
GTN-A vs QVCC Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while QVCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GTN-A has daily volatility of 0.00 and QVCC has daily volatility of N/A.Check QVCC's competition here
GTN-A vs QVCD Comparison March 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 573.4M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $10.72, while QVCD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GTN-A has daily volatility of 0.00 and QVCD has daily volatility of N/A.Check QVCD's competition here