Gray Television, Inc.
Gray Television, Inc. GTN-A Peers
See (GTN-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN-A | $7.70 | +1.32% | 468.98M | 2.29 | $3.36 | +6.92% |
| CCZ | $62.31 | +7.90% | 59.02B | 53.17 | $1.17 | +3.64% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.28B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.28B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.28B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $17.21 | +0.70% | 2.77B | 4.88 | $3.53 | +2.89% |
| NMAX | $24.58 | +0.99% | 2.19B | -39.65 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| FUBO | $2.85 | +5.84% | 972.40M | 14.24 | $0.20 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.65 | +9.93% | 429.14M | 1.38 | $3.36 | +6.92% |
| CURI | $5.08 | +1.80% | 289.21M | -21.17 | -$0.24 | +1.75% |
Stock Comparison
GTN-A vs CCZ Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 59.02B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while CCZ trades at $62.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 53.17. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A and CCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GTN-A vs LSXMA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs LSXMK Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs LSXMB Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs TGNA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while TGNA trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs NMAX Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while NMAX trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -39.65. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs FUBO Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 972.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while FUBO trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs GTN Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 429.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while GTN trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs CURI Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 289.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while CURI trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SSP Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 219.73M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while SSP trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs EVC Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 183.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while EVC trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs IHRT Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 177.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while IHRT trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SGA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 73.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while SGA trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs MDIA Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 40.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while MDIA trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs UONE Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 37.26M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while UONE trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SALM Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 36.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while SALM trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs UONEK Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 36.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while UONEK trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs SJ Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 34.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while SJ trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs XHLD Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 18.65M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while XHLD trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs AUD Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs BBGI Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 10.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while BBGI trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A and BBGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GTN-A vs CURIW Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 5.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while CURIW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.
GTN-A vs CMLS Comparison
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 468.98M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $7.70, while CMLS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of 2.29, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.