VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GRIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GRIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRIN | $25.74 | -0.99% | 505.7M | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| KEX | $118.48 | +2.15% | 6.6B | 23.47 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $109.41 | +0.57% | 3.6B | 7.26 | $15.07 | +1.25% |
| HAFN | $5.52 | -0.36% | 2.8B | 4.60 | $1.20 | +16.56% |
| SB-PC | $25.91 | -0.01% | 2.7B | 17.18 | $1.51 | +4.74% |
| SB-PD | $25.52 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 16.92 | $1.51 | +4.74% |
| SBLK | $18.80 | -1.21% | 2.2B | 9.84 | $1.91 | +7.62% |
| BWLP | $13.72 | -1.50% | 2.1B | 7.33 | $1.87 | +12.37% |
| ZIM | $16.73 | +1.46% | 2B | 0.86 | $19.52 | +51.04% |
| CDLR | $22.14 | -0.40% | 1.9B | 18.15 | $1.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GRIN vs KEX Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while KEX trades at $118.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check KEX's competition here
GRIN vs MATX Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while MATX trades at $109.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check MATX's competition here
GRIN vs HAFN Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while HAFN trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check HAFN's competition here
GRIN vs SB-PC Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SB-PC trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and SB-PC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SB-PC's competition here
GRIN vs SB-PD Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SB-PD trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and SB-PD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SB-PD's competition here
GRIN vs SBLK Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SBLK trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SBLK's competition here
GRIN vs BWLP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while BWLP trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check BWLP's competition here
GRIN vs ZIM Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ZIM trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ZIM's competition here
GRIN vs CDLR Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CDLR trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CDLR's competition here
GRIN vs CMBT Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMBT trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMBT's competition here
GRIN vs GOGL Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GOGL trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GOGL's competition here
GRIN vs DAC Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while DAC trades at $92.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check DAC's competition here
GRIN vs SFL Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SFL trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SFL's competition here
GRIN vs CCEC Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CCEC trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CCEC's competition here
GRIN vs SBBA Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SBBA's competition here
GRIN vs NMM Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NMM trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NMM's competition here
GRIN vs CMRE-PC Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMRE-PC trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
GRIN vs CMRE-PD Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
GRIN vs CMRE-PB Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and CMRE-PB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMRE-PB's competition here
GRIN vs CMRE Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMRE trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMRE's competition here
GRIN vs GSL Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GSL trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GSL's competition here
GRIN vs GSL-PB Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GSL-PB trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GSL-PB's competition here
GRIN vs CMRE-PE Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
GRIN vs CPLP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CPLP's competition here
GRIN vs ECO Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 773.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ECO trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ECO's competition here
GRIN vs GNK Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GNK trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GNK's competition here
GRIN vs NAT Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 578.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NAT trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NAT's competition here
GRIN vs NETI Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NETI's competition here
GRIN vs SB Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SB trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SB's competition here
GRIN vs ASC Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ASC trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ASC's competition here
GRIN vs ESEA Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ESEA trades at $51.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ESEA's competition here
GRIN vs CLCO Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CLCO trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CLCO's competition here
GRIN vs HSHP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while HSHP trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check HSHP's competition here
GRIN vs PANL Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while PANL trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check PANL's competition here
GRIN vs GASS Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GASS trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GASS's competition here
GRIN vs KNOP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while KNOP trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check KNOP's competition here
GRIN vs CMDB Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CMDB trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CMDB's competition here
GRIN vs ESEAV Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ESEAV's competition here
GRIN vs DSX-PB Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while DSX-PB trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and DSX-PB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSX-PB's competition here
GRIN vs DSX Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while DSX trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check DSX's competition here
GRIN vs SMHI Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SMHI trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SMHI's competition here
GRIN vs SHIP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SHIP trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SHIP's competition here
GRIN vs NCT Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NCT trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NCT's competition here
GRIN vs HMR Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while HMR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check HMR's competition here
GRIN vs UFG Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while UFG trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 264.00. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check UFG's competition here
GRIN vs TORO Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while TORO trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check TORO's competition here
GRIN vs NM Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NM's competition here
GRIN vs PXSAP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and PXSAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXSAP's competition here
GRIN vs EHLDV Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check EHLDV's competition here
GRIN vs NM-PG Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check NM-PG's competition here
GRIN vs PXS Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while PXS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check PXS's competition here
GRIN vs EDRY Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while EDRY trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check EDRY's competition here
GRIN vs TOPS Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while TOPS trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check TOPS's competition here
GRIN vs HTCO Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while HTCO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check HTCO's competition here
GRIN vs CACO Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CACO's competition here
GRIN vs GLBS Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while GLBS trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check GLBS's competition here
GRIN vs PSHG Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while PSHG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check PSHG's competition here
GRIN vs CTRM Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CTRM trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CTRM's competition here
GRIN vs EHLD Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while EHLD trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check EHLD's competition here
GRIN vs NM-PH Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and NM-PH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NM-PH's competition here
GRIN vs USEA Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while USEA trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check USEA's competition here
GRIN vs ICON Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while ICON trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check ICON's competition here
GRIN vs OP Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while OP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check OP's competition here
GRIN vs CISS Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while CISS trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check CISS's competition here
GRIN vs EGLE Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while EGLE trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN and EGLE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGLE's competition here
GRIN vs PXSAW Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 146.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while PXSAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check PXSAW's competition here
GRIN vs SHIPW Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SHIPW's competition here
GRIN vs SBLKZ Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SBLKZ's competition here
GRIN vs TOROV Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check TOROV's competition here
GRIN vs SHIPZ Comparison July 2025
GRIN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRIN stands at 505.7M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRIN is priced at $25.74, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRIN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GRIN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRIN is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRIN.Check SHIPZ's competition here