Gentex Corporation

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check APTV-PA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while APTV trades at $65.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check APTV's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MGA trades at $41.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MGA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MBLY trades at $13.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MBLY's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ALV trades at $110.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ALV's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while BWA trades at $37.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check BWA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while LKQ trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check LKQ's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ALSN trades at $87.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ALSN's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MOD trades at $133.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MOD's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while LEA trades at $93.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check LEA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while QS trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check QS's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while BC-PA trades at $24.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check BC-PA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check BC-PB's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while DORM trades at $119.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check DORM's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while VC trades at $110.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check VC's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while GT trades at $10.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check GT's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while GTX trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check GTX's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HSAI trades at $18.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -1873.00. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HSAI's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while DAN trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -65.15. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check DAN's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while PHIN trades at $49.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check PHIN's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ADNT trades at $21.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ADNT's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while FOXF trades at $29.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check FOXF's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while THRM trades at $31.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check THRM's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 871.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while AEVA trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -6.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check AEVA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 871.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while XPEL trades at $31.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check XPEL's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SMP trades at $30.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SMP's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 647.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while PLOW trades at $27.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check PLOW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check GTXAP's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ECX trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ECX's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 511.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while AXL trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check AXL's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ALLG's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while CPS trades at $26.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check CPS's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 460.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MLR trades at $40.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MLR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SES trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SES's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MNRO trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MNRO's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while INVZW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check INVZW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while INVZ trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check INVZ's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HLLY-WT's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while STRT trades at $62.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check STRT's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HYLN trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HYLN's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HLLY trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HLLY's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SRI trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SRI's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MPAA trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MPAA's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check XL's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while LAZR trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check LAZR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while CAAS trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check CAAS's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while GGR trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check GGR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while KNDI trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check KNDI's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while LIDR trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check LIDR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while LIDRW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check LIDRW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while WPRT trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check WPRT's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while CVGI trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check CVGI's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SYPR trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -94.50. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SYPR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MKDW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MKDW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check ECXWW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check NCNCW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check NCNC's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check AMV's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while WKSP trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check WKSP's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SAG's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while SUP trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check SUP's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while INEO trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check INEO's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while FRSX trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check FRSX's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while CREV trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check CREV's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while GGROW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check GGROW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MKDWW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MKDWW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check UFAB's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check WKSPW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 209.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while CREVW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check CREVW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HYZNW's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check MTOR's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check HZN's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check VNE's competition here

GNTX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GNTX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNTX is priced at $26.28, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GNTX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.85, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, GNTX's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNTX is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNTX.Check RMO's competition here