GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $2.10 | -1.87% | 211.2M | 13.87 | $0.15 | +4.06% |
| MAR | $268.27 | -2.03% | 72.9B | 30.28 | $8.87 | +0.97% |
| HLT | $273.98 | -1.27% | 64.4B | 42.22 | $6.49 | +0.22% |
| IHG | $120.88 | -1.50% | 18.9B | 25.66 | $4.72 | +1.43% |
| H | $141.67 | -1.66% | 13.5B | 32.24 | $4.39 | +0.42% |
| HTHT | $36.24 | -0.01% | 10.9B | 21.48 | $1.66 | +2.72% |
| WH | $87.60 | -1.55% | 6.7B | 20.59 | $4.25 | +1.81% |
| CHH | $119.36 | -2.04% | 5.5B | 18.44 | $6.47 | +0.96% |
| ATAT | $36.79 | +2.98% | 4.9B | 27.86 | $1.26 | +3.68% |
| SHCO | $8.82 | +0.23% | 1.7B | -28.44 | -$0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while MAR trades at $268.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while HLT trades at $273.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while IHG trades at $120.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while H trades at $141.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas H's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to H's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while HTHT trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while WH trades at $87.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check WH's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while CHH trades at $119.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHH's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while ATAT trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while SHCO trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while SONDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while INTG trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while SOND trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs LUXH Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 329.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXH's competition here
GHG vs LUXHP Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXHP's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison August 2025
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 211.2M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $2.10, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here