GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GHG
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GHG
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $1.24 | +1.64% | 125.6M | 4.77 | $0.26 | +4.11% |
| MAR | $352.93 | +1.25% | 93.5B | 37.15 | $9.50 | +0.76% |
| HLT | $322.51 | +1.67% | 74B | 52.62 | $6.13 | +0.19% |
| IHG | $143.14 | +1.35% | 21.7B | 29.41 | $4.87 | +1.21% |
| HTHT | $53.70 | -0.07% | 16.5B | 23.15 | $2.32 | +1.47% |
| H | $155.69 | +2.64% | 14.9B | -283.11 | -$0.55 | +0.38% |
| WH | $86.12 | +3.65% | 6.5B | 34.44 | $2.50 | +1.94% |
| CHH | $113.07 | +5.09% | 5.2B | 14.31 | $7.90 | +1.03% |
| ATAT | $36.57 | -2.58% | 5.1B | 21.64 | $1.69 | +2.04% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while MAR trades at $352.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while HLT trades at $322.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 52.62. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while IHG trades at $143.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while HTHT trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while H trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas H's P/E ratio is -283.11. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to H's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while WH trades at $86.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check WH's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while CHH trades at $113.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHH's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while ATAT trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while INTG trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -61.88. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs LUXH Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXH's competition here
GHG vs LUXHP Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXHP's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs HOT Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HOT's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison April 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 125.6M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.24, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.77, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here