Gerdau S.A.
Gerdau S.A. (GGB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GGB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGB | $3.80 | +5.26% | 7.6B | 29.23 | $0.13 | +2.95% |
| MT | $54.03 | +3.94% | 41.4B | 13.15 | $4.11 | +1.20% |
| NUE | $173.72 | +2.73% | 39.6B | 23.13 | $7.51 | +1.32% |
| STLD | $182.85 | +1.58% | 26.5B | 22.88 | $7.99 | +1.13% |
| PKX | $58.63 | +0.24% | 17.7B | 40.72 | $1.44 | +2.89% |
| RS | $307.38 | +1.14% | 16.1B | 22.00 | $13.97 | +1.60% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.09% |
| TX | $40.79 | +1.59% | 8B | 18.54 | $2.20 | +6.76% |
| CMC | $62.86 | +2.33% | 7B | 14.06 | $4.47 | +1.17% |
| SIM | $31.36 | +1.82% | 5.2B | 25.92 | $1.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GGB vs MT Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MT trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MT's competition here
GGB vs NUE Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while NUE trades at $173.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check NUE's competition here
GGB vs STLD Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while STLD trades at $182.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check STLD's competition here
GGB vs PKX Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while PKX trades at $58.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check PKX's competition here
GGB vs RS Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while RS trades at $307.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check RS's competition here
GGB vs X Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check X's competition here
GGB vs TX Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while TX trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check TX's competition here
GGB vs CMC Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while CMC trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check CMC's competition here
GGB vs SIM Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while SIM trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SIM's competition here
GGB vs CLF Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while CLF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check CLF's competition here
GGB vs SID Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while SID trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SID's competition here
GGB vs WS Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while WS trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check WS's competition here
GGB vs SCHN Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SCHN's competition here
GGB vs TMST Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check TMST's competition here
GGB vs RDUS Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check RDUS's competition here
GGB vs MTUS Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 685.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MTUS trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -547.67. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTUS's competition here
GGB vs ZEUS Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ZEUS's competition here
GGB vs ASTL Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while ASTL trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ASTL's competition here
GGB vs MSB Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MSB trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MSB's competition here
GGB vs USAP Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check USAP's competition here
GGB vs SYNL Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SYNL's competition here
GGB vs ACNT Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while ACNT trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ACNT's competition here
GGB vs FRD Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while FRD trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check FRD's competition here
GGB vs LUD Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while LUD trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -41.37. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check LUD's competition here
GGB vs HLP Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while HLP trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check HLP's competition here
GGB vs KBSX Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while KBSX trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check KBSX's competition here
GGB vs HUDI Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while HUDI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check HUDI's competition here
GGB vs ZKIN Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while ZKIN trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ZKIN's competition here
GGB vs ASTLW Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while ASTLW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ASTLW's competition here
GGB vs INHD Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 311.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while INHD trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check INHD's competition here
GGB vs MTL Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTL's competition here
GGB vs MTL-P Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTL-P's competition here
GGB vs OSN Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check OSN's competition here
GGB vs MTCN Comparison April 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $3.80, while MTCN trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 29.23, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTCN's competition here