Gerdau S.A.
Gerdau S.A. (GGB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GGB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGB | $4.07 | -2.16% | 8.3B | 14.09 | $0.29 | +2.67% |
| MT | $65.19 | -2.45% | 50B | 15.86 | $4.11 | +0.91% |
| NUE | $175.15 | -2.07% | 40.1B | 23.30 | $7.52 | +1.26% |
| STLD | $190.87 | -2.62% | 27.9B | 23.89 | $7.99 | +1.04% |
| PKX | $69.12 | +2.60% | 20.9B | 49.38 | $1.40 | +2.43% |
| RS | $317.11 | -1.73% | 16.6B | 23.08 | $13.75 | +1.51% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.09% |
| TX | $42.91 | -0.97% | 8.4B | 14.78 | $2.90 | +6.32% |
| CMC | $74.16 | -1.96% | 8.2B | 19.21 | $3.86 | +0.96% |
| CLF | $10.59 | -1.76% | 6B | -3.65 | -$2.90 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GGB vs MT Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while MT trades at $65.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MT's competition here
GGB vs NUE Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while NUE trades at $175.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check NUE's competition here
GGB vs STLD Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while STLD trades at $190.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check STLD's competition here
GGB vs PKX Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while PKX trades at $69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check PKX's competition here
GGB vs RS Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while RS trades at $317.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check RS's competition here
GGB vs X Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check X's competition here
GGB vs TX Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while TX trades at $42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check TX's competition here
GGB vs CMC Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while CMC trades at $74.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check CMC's competition here
GGB vs CLF Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while CLF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check CLF's competition here
GGB vs SIM Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while SIM trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SIM's competition here
GGB vs SID Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while SID trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SID's competition here
GGB vs WS Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while WS trades at $43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check WS's competition here
GGB vs SCHN Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SCHN's competition here
GGB vs TMST Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check TMST's competition here
GGB vs RDUS Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check RDUS's competition here
GGB vs MTUS Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while MTUS trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -93.56. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTUS's competition here
GGB vs ZEUS Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ZEUS's competition here
GGB vs ASTL Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while ASTL trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ASTL's competition here
GGB vs USAP Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check USAP's competition here
GGB vs MSB Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while MSB trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MSB's competition here
GGB vs ACNT Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while ACNT trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.94. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ACNT's competition here
GGB vs SYNL Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check SYNL's competition here
GGB vs LUD Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while LUD trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check LUD's competition here
GGB vs FRD Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while FRD trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check FRD's competition here
GGB vs HLP Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while HLP trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check HLP's competition here
GGB vs KBSX Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while KBSX trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check KBSX's competition here
GGB vs ASTLW Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while ASTLW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ASTLW's competition here
GGB vs HUDI Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while HUDI trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check HUDI's competition here
GGB vs ZKIN Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while ZKIN trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check ZKIN's competition here
GGB vs INHD Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 355.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while INHD trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check INHD's competition here
GGB vs MTL-P Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTL-P's competition here
GGB vs MTL Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check MTL's competition here
GGB vs OSN Comparison February 2026
GGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGB stands at 8.3B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GGB is priced at $4.07, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.09, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, GGB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GGB is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGB.Check OSN's competition here