Gaumont SA
Gaumont SA (GAM.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GAM.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAM.PA | €81.00 | +0.62% | 252.3M | -32.93 | -€2.46 | N/A |
| UMG.AS | €25.46 | +0.20% | 46.7B | 22.53 | €1.13 | +2.04% |
| BOL.PA | €5.11 | -0.78% | 14.2B | 102.20 | €0.05 | +1.57% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €3.31 | +0.24% | 3.3B | -18.41 | -€0.18 | +1.21% |
| KIN.BR | €35.80 | -1.65% | 957.6M | 24.03 | €1.49 | +1.54% |
| SCP.LS | €1.00 | +3.09% | 202M | -4.00 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| AJAX.AS | €9.54 | -1.24% | 174.9M | -18.00 | -€0.53 | N/A |
| DEEZR.PA | €1.24 | +0.81% | 147.4M | -5.90 | -€0.21 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.62 | +0.00% | 136.9M | 14.73 | €0.11 | +7.72% |
Stock Comparison
GAM.PA vs UMG.AS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, UMG.AS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while UMG.AS trades at €25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas UMG.AS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UMG.AS's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to UMG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check UMG.AS's competition here
GAM.PA vs BOL.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while BOL.PA trades at €5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 102.20. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check BOL.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs FLE.AS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check FLE.AS's competition here
GAM.PA vs VIV.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while VIV.PA trades at €3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check VIV.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs KIN.BR Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 957.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while KIN.BR trades at €35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check KIN.BR's competition here
GAM.PA vs SCP.LS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while SCP.LS trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to SCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check SCP.LS's competition here
GAM.PA vs AJAX.AS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while AJAX.AS trades at €9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
GAM.PA vs DEEZR.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 147.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs MCP.LS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while MCP.LS trades at €1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to MCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check MCP.LS's competition here
GAM.PA vs SLBEN.LS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while SLBEN.LS trades at €5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
GAM.PA vs ALECP.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of -19.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs TCHCS.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs FCP.LS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while FCP.LS trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to FCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check FCP.LS's competition here
GAM.PA vs SCB.LS Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, SCB.LS has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while SCB.LS trades at €14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas SCB.LS's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCB.LS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is more volatile compared to SCB.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check SCB.LS's competition here
GAM.PA vs XIL.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, XIL.PA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while XIL.PA trades at €2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas XIL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XIL.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to XIL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check XIL.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs TCH.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check TCH.PA's competition here
GAM.PA vs ECP.PA Comparison July 2025
GAM.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAM.PA stands at 252.3M. In comparison, ECP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GAM.PA is priced at €81.00, while ECP.PA trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAM.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -32.93, whereas ECP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, GAM.PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ECP.PA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GAM.PA is less volatile compared to ECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAM.PA.Check ECP.PA's competition here