Arcimoto, Inc.
Arcimoto, Inc. (FUV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FUV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUV | $0.38 | -5.94% | 4.2M | -0.04 | -$9.72 | N/A |
| THO | $95.26 | -0.61% | 5.1B | 22.63 | $4.20 | +2.10% |
| BC-PC | $23.88 | +0.51% | 3.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.99% |
| DOOO | $51.09 | -0.91% | 3.7B | 28.63 | $1.79 | +1.18% |
| BC | $58.52 | +2.31% | 3.7B | 64.64 | $0.88 | +2.99% |
| HOG | $24.22 | +0.54% | 2.9B | 11.88 | $2.04 | +2.91% |
| PII | $52.68 | +1.17% | 2.9B | -27.24 | -$1.89 | +5.14% |
| LCII | $95.82 | +0.04% | 2.3B | 15.91 | $5.98 | +4.71% |
| WGO | $30.54 | -0.89% | 851.6M | -54.25 | -$0.56 | +4.46% |
| MBUU | $33.17 | +2.82% | 612.2M | -74.19 | -$0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FUV vs THO Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while THO trades at $95.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check THO's competition here
FUV vs BC-PC Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC-PC trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC-PC's competition here
FUV vs DOOO Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOOO trades at $51.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOOO's competition here
FUV vs BC Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC trades at $58.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC's P/E ratio is 64.64. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC's competition here
FUV vs HOG Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HOG trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HOG's competition here
FUV vs PII Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while PII trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -27.24. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check PII's competition here
FUV vs LCII Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while LCII trades at $95.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check LCII's competition here
FUV vs WGO Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 851.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while WGO trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is -54.25. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check WGO's competition here
FUV vs MBUU Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MBUU trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is -74.19. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MBUU's competition here
FUV vs MCFT Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 320.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCFT trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is -37.88. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCFT's competition here
FUV vs MPX Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MPX trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MPX's competition here
FUV vs ONEW Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while ONEW trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -20.85. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check ONEW's competition here
FUV vs MAMO Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MAMO trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is -61.80. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MAMO's competition here
FUV vs HLBZ Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZ's competition here
FUV vs REE Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REE's competition here
FUV vs VMAR Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VMAR trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VMAR's competition here
FUV vs VEEE Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VEEE trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VEEE's competition here
FUV vs FRZA Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check FRZA's competition here
FUV vs EZGO Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EZGO trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EZGO's competition here
FUV vs MCOM Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 368.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCOM's competition here
FUV vs REEAW Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REEAW's competition here
FUV vs HLBZW Comparison August 2025
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZW's competition here