Arcimoto, Inc.
Arcimoto, Inc. (FUV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FUV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUV | $0.38 | -5.94% | 4.2M | -0.04 | -$9.72 | N/A |
| DOOO | $65.85 | +0.38% | 4.8B | 27.67 | $2.38 | +0.94% |
| DOO | $64.34 | +0.53% | 4.7B | 26.13 | $2.44 | +0.97% |
| BC | $71.59 | +3.77% | 4.5B | -33.47 | -$2.06 | +2.51% |
| THO | $83.18 | +1.02% | 4.3B | 14.62 | $5.63 | +2.48% |
| LCII | $126.00 | +2.16% | 3B | 16.27 | $7.57 | +3.74% |
| PII | $51.88 | +1.06% | 2.9B | -6.16 | -$8.18 | +5.31% |
| HOG | $17.89 | -0.45% | 2.1B | 6.34 | $2.78 | +4.08% |
| BC-PC | $24.54 | -0.39% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.51% |
| WGO | $34.20 | +2.24% | 956.4M | 26.27 | $1.29 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
FUV vs DOOO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOOO trades at $65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOOO's competition here
FUV vs DOO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOO trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOO's competition here
FUV vs BC Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC trades at $71.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -33.47. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC's competition here
FUV vs THO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while THO trades at $83.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check THO's competition here
FUV vs LCII Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while LCII trades at $126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check LCII's competition here
FUV vs PII Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while PII trades at $51.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check PII's competition here
FUV vs HOG Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HOG trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HOG's competition here
FUV vs BC-PC Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC-PC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC-PC's competition here
FUV vs WGO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 956.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while WGO trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check WGO's competition here
FUV vs MBUU Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 495.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MBUU trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MBUU's competition here
FUV vs MCFT Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCFT trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCFT's competition here
FUV vs MPX Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MPX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MPX's competition here
FUV vs EMPD Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EMPD trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EMPD's competition here
FUV vs ONEW Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 140.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while ONEW trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check ONEW's competition here
FUV vs MAMO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MAMO trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MAMO's competition here
FUV vs HLBZ Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZ's competition here
FUV vs REE Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REE trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REE's competition here
FUV vs FRZA Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check FRZA's competition here
FUV vs VMAR Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VMAR trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VMAR's competition here
FUV vs VEEE Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 751.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VEEE trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VEEE's competition here
FUV vs MCOM Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 728.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCOM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCOM's competition here
FUV vs EZGO Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 294.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EZGO trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EZGO's competition here
FUV vs REEAW Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REEAW's competition here
FUV vs HLBZW Comparison March 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZW's competition here