Arcimoto, Inc.
Arcimoto, Inc. FUV Peers
See (FUV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUV | $0.38 | -5.94% | 3.4M | -0.04 | -$9.72 | N/A |
| THO | $93.23 | -1.46% | 5B | 22.35 | $4.17 | +2.65% |
| BC | $60.57 | -1.51% | 4B | 40.13 | $1.51 | +2.80% |
| BC-PC | $24.39 | +0.16% | 3.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.80% |
| DOOO | $50.02 | -2.32% | 3.7B | 27.62 | $1.81 | +1.22% |
| HOG | $24.62 | -1.95% | 3B | 8.83 | $2.79 | +3.54% |
| PII | $49.99 | -0.16% | 2.8B | 70.42 | $0.71 | +6.62% |
| LCII | $100.17 | -1.00% | 2.5B | 16.45 | $6.10 | +5.52% |
| WGO | $33.33 | -0.24% | 934.4M | -59.53 | -$0.56 | +4.99% |
| MBUU | $35.17 | -1.29% | 675.3M | -81.84 | -$0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FUV vs THO Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while THO trades at $93.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs BC Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC trades at $60.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC's P/E ratio is 40.13. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs BC-PC Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC-PC trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs DOOO Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOOO trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs HOG Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HOG trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs PII Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while PII trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PII's P/E ratio is 70.42. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs LCII Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while LCII trades at $100.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs WGO Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 934.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while WGO trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is -59.53. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs MBUU Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 675.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MBUU trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is -81.84. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs MCFT Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 335.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCFT trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is -39.63. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs MPX Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MPX trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs ONEW Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while ONEW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -36.45. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs MAMO Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MAMO trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is -45.40. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs HLBZ Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs REE Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REE trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs VMAR Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VMAR trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs VEEE Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VEEE trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs FRZA Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs EZGO Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EZGO trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs MCOM Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs HLBZW Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.
FUV vs REEAW Comparison
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 3.4M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.