Forza X1, Inc.
Forza X1, Inc. (FRZA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRZA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRZA | $0.20 | +0.00% | 3.2M | -0.51 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| THO | $113.24 | +0.00% | 6B | 21.53 | $5.28 | +1.79% |
| DOO | $80.26 | +0.00% | 6B | 33.46 | $2.44 | +0.76% |
| DOOO | $79.85 | -0.01% | 5.8B | 33.55 | $2.38 | +0.78% |
| BC | $86.81 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -43.28 | -$2.06 | +1.93% |
| PII | $65.35 | +0.00% | 3.8B | -8.11 | -$8.18 | +4.04% |
| LCII | $145.90 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 20.64 | $7.15 | +3.09% |
| HOG | $20.28 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 7.24 | $2.78 | +3.54% |
| BC-PC | $25.15 | +0.01% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.93% |
| WGO | $45.97 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 36.58 | $1.28 | +2.96% |
Stock Comparison
FRZA vs THO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while THO trades at $113.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check THO's competition here
FRZA vs DOO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while DOO trades at $80.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check DOO's competition here
FRZA vs DOOO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while DOOO trades at $79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check DOOO's competition here
FRZA vs BC Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while BC trades at $86.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -43.28. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check BC's competition here
FRZA vs PII Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while PII trades at $65.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check PII's competition here
FRZA vs LCII Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while LCII trades at $145.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check LCII's competition here
FRZA vs HOG Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while HOG trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check HOG's competition here
FRZA vs BC-PC Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while BC-PC trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check BC-PC's competition here
FRZA vs WGO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while WGO trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check WGO's competition here
FRZA vs MBUU Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 608.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while MBUU trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MBUU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check MBUU's competition here
FRZA vs MCFT Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 379.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while MCFT trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check MCFT's competition here
FRZA vs MPX Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while MPX trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check MPX's competition here
FRZA vs ONEW Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while ONEW trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check ONEW's competition here
FRZA vs EMPD Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while EMPD trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check EMPD's competition here
FRZA vs MAMO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while MAMO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is -46.06. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MAMO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check MAMO's competition here
FRZA vs HLBZ Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check HLBZ's competition here
FRZA vs REE Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while REE trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check REE's competition here
FRZA vs FUV Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check FUV's competition here
FRZA vs VMAR Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while VMAR trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check VMAR's competition here
FRZA vs VEEE Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while VEEE trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check VEEE's competition here
FRZA vs MCOM Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 873.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while MCOM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check MCOM's competition here
FRZA vs EZGO Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 366.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while EZGO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check EZGO's competition here
FRZA vs HLBZW Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check HLBZW's competition here
FRZA vs REEAW Comparison February 2026
FRZA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRZA stands at 3.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRZA is priced at $0.20, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRZA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.51, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRZA's ROE is -0.40%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRZA is more volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRZA.Check REEAW's competition here