Friedman Industries, Incorporated

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while NUE trades at $164.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check NUE's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MT trades at $48.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MT's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while STLD trades at $171.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check STLD's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while PKX trades at $56.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check PKX's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while RS trades at $300.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RS's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check X's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while TX trades at $38.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TX's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while GGB trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check GGB's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while CMC trades at $60.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CMC's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while SIM trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SIM's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while CLF trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CLF's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while SID trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SID's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while WS trades at $28.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check WS's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SCHN's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TMST's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RDUS's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 675.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MTUS trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -539.33. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTUS's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZEUS's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check USAP's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 422.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MSB trades at $32.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MSB's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while ASTL trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ASTL's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while SYNL trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SYNL's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while ACNT trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ACNT's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while LUD trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -40.75. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check LUD's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while HLP trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HLP's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while KBSX trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check KBSX's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while HUDI trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HUDI's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while ASTLW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ASTLW's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while ZKIN trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZKIN's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 281.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while INHD trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check INHD's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MTCN trades at $61.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTCN's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check OSN's competition here

FRD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 126.5M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $17.79, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL-P's competition here