Fossil Group, Inc. 7% Senior Notes due 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. 7% Senior Notes due 2026 (FOSLL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOSLL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSLL | $17.01 | +0.18% | 74.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPR | $152.30 | -3.05% | 31.3B | 59.30 | $2.58 | +0.98% |
| SIG | $95.07 | -2.91% | 3.9B | 28.46 | $3.32 | +1.36% |
| REAL | $11.16 | +0.45% | 3.2B | -10.86 | -$1.01 | N/A |
| CPRI | $21.35 | -3.61% | 2.4B | -2.09 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LUXE | $9.77 | +0.51% | 921.5M | 1.66 | $5.74 | N/A |
| MOV | $24.93 | -3.41% | 392.8M | 25.56 | $0.98 | +5.61% |
| ELA | $12.99 | -1.89% | 336M | 33.18 | $0.39 | N/A |
| FOSL | $4.32 | -7.49% | 269M | -3.76 | -$1.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FOSLL vs TPR Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while TPR trades at $152.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 59.30. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check TPR's competition here
FOSLL vs SIG Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while SIG trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check SIG's competition here
FOSLL vs REAL Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while REAL trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check REAL's competition here
FOSLL vs CPRI Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while CPRI trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check CPRI's competition here
FOSLL vs MYTE Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check MYTE's competition here
FOSLL vs LUXE Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 921.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while LUXE trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check LUXE's competition here
FOSLL vs MOV Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 392.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while MOV trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check MOV's competition here
FOSLL vs ELA Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 336M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while ELA trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check ELA's competition here
FOSLL vs FOSL Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while FOSL trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check FOSL's competition here
FOSLL vs TOPW Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while TOPW trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -1033.00. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check TOPW's competition here
FOSLL vs LANV Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while LANV trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LANV's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check LANV's competition here
FOSLL vs BRLT Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while BRLT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -50.33. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check BRLT's competition here
FOSLL vs BGI Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while BGI trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check BGI's competition here
FOSLL vs FMFC Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while FMFC trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check FMFC's competition here
FOSLL vs CTHR Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 623.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while CTHR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check CTHR's competition here
FOSLL vs JEWL Comparison February 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.49%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL and JEWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JEWL's competition here