Federal-Mogul Goetze (India) Limited

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹118.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹118.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 986.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹35,935.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 985.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹35,942.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 799B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,781.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 798.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,780.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 73.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 589.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,090.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 589.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,090.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 579.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹3,883.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 579.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹3,884.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 539.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MRF.BO trades at ₹133,061.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MRF.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 539.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MRF.NS trades at ₹133,050.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MRF.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 500.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,727.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 84.01. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 411.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,222.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 411B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 320.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹533.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 320.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹533.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 311.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,359.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 311.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,358.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 278.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹14,094.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 278B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,887.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 262.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹436.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 261.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹435.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 259.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,460.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 258.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,439.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 252.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹314.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 252.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹315.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 245.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹38.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 245.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹38.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹854.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 66.23. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹854.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹469.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹469.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 169.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹193.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹194.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹7,351.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹7,337.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹779.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹780.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹12,956.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹12,963.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,541.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,541.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹580.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 172.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JBMA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹580.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 175.11. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JBMA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,130.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹919.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹918.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹532.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 118.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹532.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹422.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹422.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,691.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,694.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.56. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹440.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹440.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, OLECTRA.NS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while OLECTRA.NS trades at ₹1,085.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas OLECTRA.NS's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OLECTRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to OLECTRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check OLECTRA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹573.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹574.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹500.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 41.01. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check VARROC.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹500.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check VARROC.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹569.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹568.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹9,920.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 180.88. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹9,898.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 180.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹5,659.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹427.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹427.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,732.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,736.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,161.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,161.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,723.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SJS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,722.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SJS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹120.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹121.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹726.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,228.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹725.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,251.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,756.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,764.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹802.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹799.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹133.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹133.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹201.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SSWL.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹201.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SSWL.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹486.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹490.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹488.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,627.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,630.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,713.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,699.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FMGOETZE.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while FMGOETZE.NS trades at ₹442.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas FMGOETZE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FMGOETZE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to FMGOETZE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check FMGOETZE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 23.9B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹441.30, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹991.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.22, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here