Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FLZH's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FLZH and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLZH | $0.10 | +0.00% | 121.2K | -0.00 | -$43.62 | N/A |
| SIRI | $27.31 | -1.53% | 9.2B | 10.71 | $2.55 | +3.98% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| NXST | $156.53 | -3.58% | 4.8B | 9.66 | $16.20 | +4.69% |
| TGNA | $20.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.95 | $1.34 | +2.50% |
| FUBO | $10.04 | +1.47% | 1.1B | -11.16 | -$0.90 | N/A |
| NMAX | $10.32 | +0.58% | 927.1M | -15.05 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SBGI | $13.08 | -3.89% | 914.1M | 17.44 | $0.75 | +7.57% |
Stock Comparison
Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: SIRI)
FLZH vs SIRI Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while SIRI trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIRI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check SIRI's competition here
The Liberty SiriusXM Group (NASDAQ: LSXMK)
FLZH vs LSXMK Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check LSXMK's competition here
The Liberty SiriusXM Group (NASDAQ: LSXMA)
FLZH vs LSXMA Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check LSXMA's competition here
The Liberty SiriusXM Group (NASDAQ: LSXMB)
FLZH vs LSXMB Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check LSXMB's competition here
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NXST)
FLZH vs NXST Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while NXST trades at $156.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check NXST's competition here
TEGNA Inc. (NYSE: TGNA)
FLZH vs TGNA Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while TGNA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check TGNA's competition here
fuboTV Inc. (NYSE: FUBO)
FLZH vs FUBO Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while FUBO trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check FUBO's competition here
Newsmax, Inc. (NYSE: NMAX)
FLZH vs NMAX Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 927.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while NMAX trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check NMAX's competition here
Sinclair, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBGI)
FLZH vs SBGI Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while SBGI trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check SBGI's competition here
QVC Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: QVCG)
FLZH vs QVCG Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, QVCG has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while QVCG trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QVCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QVCG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to QVCG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check QVCG's competition here
Entravision Communications (NYSE: EVC)
FLZH vs EVC Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 718.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while EVC trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -37.17. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check EVC's competition here
Gray Media, Inc. (NYSE: GTN)
FLZH vs GTN Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while GTN trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check GTN's competition here
Gray Media, Inc. (NYSE: GTN-A)
FLZH vs GTN-A Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 328.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while GTN-A trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check GTN-A's competition here
iHeartMedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: IHRT)
FLZH vs IHRT Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while IHRT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check IHRT's competition here
The E.W. Scripps Company (NASDAQ: SSP)
FLZH vs SSP Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 240.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while SSP trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSP's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check SSP's competition here
CuriosityStream Inc. (NASDAQ: CURI)
FLZH vs CURI Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while CURI trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check CURI's competition here
Charter Communications, Inc. Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: CHTRP)
FLZH vs CHTRP Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, CHTRP has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while CHTRP trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHTRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHTRP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to CHTRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check CHTRP's competition here
MediaCo Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MDIA)
FLZH vs MDIA Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while MDIA trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check MDIA's competition here
Townsquare Media, Inc. (NYSE: TSQ)
FLZH vs TSQ Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while TSQ trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check TSQ's competition here
Saga Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGA)
FLZH vs SGA Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while SGA trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check SGA's competition here
FreeCast, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: CAST)
FLZH vs CAST Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, CAST has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while CAST trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAST's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAST's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to CAST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check CAST's competition here
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: XHLD)
FLZH vs XHLD Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while XHLD trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check XHLD's competition here
Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBGI)
FLZH vs BBGI Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while BBGI trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -9.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check BBGI's competition here
Urban One, Inc. (NASDAQ: UONEK)
FLZH vs UONEK Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while UONEK trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check UONEK's competition here
Audacy, Inc. (NYSE: AUD)
FLZH vs AUD Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUD's ROE of +32.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to AUD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check AUD's competition here
Urban One, Inc. (NASDAQ: UONE)
FLZH vs UONE Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while UONE trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check UONE's competition here
urban-gro, Inc. (NASDAQ: UGRO)
FLZH vs UGRO Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while UGRO trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check UGRO's competition here
CuriosityStream Inc. (NASDAQ: CURIW)
FLZH vs CURIW Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURIW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check CURIW's competition here
QVC, Inc. 6.250% Senior Secured (NYSE: QVCC)
FLZH vs QVCC Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while QVCC trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check QVCC's competition here
Emmis Communications Corp., 6.25% Series A Cumul Convertible Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: EMMSP)
FLZH vs EMMSP Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, EMMSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while EMMSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EMMSP's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMMSP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to EMMSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check EMMSP's competition here
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: DISCA)
FLZH vs DISCA Comparison September 2026
Flash Sports & Media, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLZH) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLZH stands at 121.2K. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLZH is priced at $0.10 on the NASDAQ, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLZH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, FLZH's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLZH is more volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLZH.Check DISCA's competition here