FreeCast, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CAST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAST | $1.55 | +140.68% | 60.8M | -4.64 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| SAP | $164.18 | +0.33% | 191.3B | 22.86 | $7.18 | +1.80% |
| APP | $496.77 | +3.80% | 166.9B | 45.62 | $10.89 | N/A |
| SHOP | $108.24 | -2.02% | 140.5B | 106.12 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $68.85 | -1.01% | 140.2B | 17.08 | $4.03 | N/A |
| CRM | $165.89 | -0.34% | 136B | 19.25 | $8.63 | +1.03% |
| CDNS | $384.96 | +0.32% | 106.2B | 90.37 | $4.26 | N/A |
| NOW | $102.15 | -0.90% | 105.4B | 60.82 | $1.68 | N/A |
| ADBE | $204.02 | -6.76% | 82.5B | 11.67 | $17.48 | N/A |
| DDOG | $229.90 | -1.85% | 81.8B | 589.49 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAST vs SAP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 191.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SAP trades at $164.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SAP's competition here
CAST vs APP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while APP trades at $496.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 45.62. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check APP's competition here
CAST vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SHOP trades at $108.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 106.12. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SHOP's competition here
CAST vs UBER Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while UBER trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check UBER's competition here
CAST vs CRM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CRM trades at $165.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CRM's competition here
CAST vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CDNS trades at $384.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 90.37. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CDNS's competition here
CAST vs NOW Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while NOW trades at $102.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check NOW's competition here
CAST vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ADBE trades at $204.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ADBE's competition here
CAST vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DDOG trades at $229.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 589.49. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DDOG's competition here
CAST vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SNOW trades at $232.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -65.90. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SNOW's competition here
CAST vs INTU Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while INTU trades at $276.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check INTU's competition here
CAST vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ADSK trades at $198.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ADSK's competition here
CAST vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while MSTR trades at $123.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check MSTR's competition here
CAST vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while WDAY trades at $130.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 43.96. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check WDAY's competition here
CAST vs ROP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ROP trades at $334.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ROP's competition here
CAST vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ANSS's competition here
CAST vs STRF Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while STRF trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check STRF's competition here
CAST vs STRC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while STRC trades at $94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check STRC's competition here
CAST vs ZM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ZM trades at $93.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ZM's competition here
CAST vs FICO Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while FICO trades at $1,179.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check FICO's competition here
CAST vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while TEAM trades at $88.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -107.95. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check TEAM's competition here
CAST vs STRK Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while STRK trades at $69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check STRK's competition here
CAST vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check AZPN's competition here
CAST vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SSNC trades at $67.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SSNC's competition here
CAST vs PTC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PTC trades at $113.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PTC's competition here
CAST vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GRAB trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GRAB's competition here
CAST vs TYL Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while TYL trades at $298.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check TYL's competition here
CAST vs GRABW Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GRABW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GRABW's competition here
CAST vs U Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while U trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.35. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check U's competition here
CAST vs DT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DT trades at $40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 75.48. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DT's competition here
CAST vs BKI Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BKI's competition here
CAST vs DAY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DAY's competition here
CAST vs XM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check XM's competition here
CAST vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CDAY's competition here
CAST vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GWRE trades at $122.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 65.90. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GWRE's competition here
CAST vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while HUBS trades at $187.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 98.99. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check HUBS's competition here
CAST vs FROG Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while FROG trades at $77.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -146.58. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check FROG's competition here
CAST vs FIG Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while FIG trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check FIG's competition here
CAST vs BSY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BSY trades at $30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BSY's competition here
CAST vs YMM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while YMM trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check YMM's competition here
CAST vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check OCFT's competition here
CAST vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DOCU trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DOCU's competition here
CAST vs MANH Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while MANH trades at $142.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check MANH's competition here
CAST vs NATI Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check NATI's competition here
CAST vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SMAR's competition here
CAST vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PAYC trades at $134.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PAYC's competition here
CAST vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while IDCC trades at $283.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check IDCC's competition here
CAST vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CWAN trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.11. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CWAN's competition here
CAST vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PCOR trades at $42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -83.08. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PCOR's competition here
CAST vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while TTAN trades at $66.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -45.73. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check TTAN's competition here
CAST vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ESTC trades at $60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ESTC's competition here
CAST vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DSGX trades at $72.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DSGX's competition here
CAST vs COUP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check COUP's competition here
CAST vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PCTY trades at $108.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PCTY's competition here
CAST vs APPF Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while APPF trades at $161.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check APPF's competition here
CAST vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DUOL trades at $122.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DUOL's competition here
CAST vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PEGA trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PEGA's competition here
CAST vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while OTEX trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check OTEX's competition here
CAST vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CVLT trades at $127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 80.86. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CVLT's competition here
CAST vs COMP Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while COMP trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 429.75. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check COMP's competition here
CAST vs NICE Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while NICE trades at $88.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check NICE's competition here
CAST vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while LYFT trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check LYFT's competition here
CAST vs YOU Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while YOU trades at $50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check YOU's competition here
CAST vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ZETA trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -202.10. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ZETA's competition here
CAST vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GBTG trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.47. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GBTG's competition here
CAST vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SRAD trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 63.96. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SRAD's competition here
CAST vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while NAVN trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check NAVN's competition here
CAST vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while OCTV trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check OCTV's competition here
CAST vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GTLB trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -185.27. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GTLB's competition here
CAST vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check OCTVV's competition here
CAST vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check GRND-WT's competition here
CAST vs CVT Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check CVT's competition here
CAST vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BTDR trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BTDR's competition here
CAST vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PYCR's competition here
CAST vs STUB Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while STUB trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check STUB's competition here
CAST vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while MNDY trades at $77.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check MNDY's competition here
CAST vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DAVE trades at $286.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DAVE's competition here
CAST vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PWSC's competition here
CAST vs DAVEW Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DAVEW trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DAVEW's competition here
CAST vs LIF Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while LIF trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check LIF's competition here
CAST vs AYX Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check AYX's competition here
CAST vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ADEA trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ADEA's competition here
CAST vs BOX Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BOX trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BOX's competition here
CAST vs ENV Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ENV's competition here
CAST vs BULL Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BULL trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BULL's competition here
CAST vs INST Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check INST's competition here
CAST vs ZI Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check ZI's competition here
CAST vs RNG Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while RNG trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check RNG's competition here
CAST vs BILL Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while BILL trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -144.24. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check BILL's competition here
CAST vs NATL Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while NATL trades at $44.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check NATL's competition here
CAST vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PTRN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.56. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PTRN's competition here
CAST vs KC Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while KC trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check KC's competition here
CAST vs PPLI Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while PPLI trades at $42.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to PPLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check PPLI's competition here
CAST vs RUM Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while RUM trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check RUM's competition here
CAST vs SOUNW Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SOUNW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SOUNW's competition here
CAST vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while SOUN trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check SOUN's competition here
CAST vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while FSLY trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check FSLY's competition here
CAST vs DBD Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while DBD trades at $81.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check DBD's competition here
CAST vs WK Comparison June 2026
CAST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAST stands at 60.8M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAST is priced at $1.55, while WK trades at $48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAST currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 204.00. In terms of profitability, CAST's ROE is +3.70%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CAST is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAST.Check WK's competition here