Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLXS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLXS | $36.92 | +1.90% | 194.2M | 14.33 | $2.57 | +1.94% |
| SN | $120.38 | +1.73% | 16.9B | 38.08 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
| MHK | $120.70 | +4.05% | 7.6B | 15.83 | $7.64 | N/A |
| WHR | $97.80 | -0.84% | 5.5B | 767.35 | $0.13 | +7.04% |
| PATK | $99.93 | +2.40% | 3.3B | 24.04 | $4.16 | +1.95% |
| LZB | $38.08 | +0.24% | 1.6B | 16.33 | $2.35 | +2.24% |
| MBC | $11.75 | +0.95% | 1.5B | 15.44 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $10.28 | +0.29% | 1.4B | -2.76 | -$3.74 | +1.94% |
| MLKN | $20.35 | +2.99% | 1.4B | -37.35 | -$0.54 | +3.72% |
Stock Comparison
FLXS vs SN Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while SN trades at $120.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SN's competition here
FLXS vs TPX Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check TPX's competition here
FLXS vs MHK Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while MHK trades at $120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MHK's competition here
FLXS vs WHR Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while WHR trades at $97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 767.35. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WHR's competition here
FLXS vs PATK Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while PATK trades at $99.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PATK's competition here
FLXS vs LZB Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while LZB trades at $38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LZB's competition here
FLXS vs MBC Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while MBC trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MBC's competition here
FLXS vs LEG Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while LEG trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LEG's competition here
FLXS vs MLKN Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while MLKN trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -37.35. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MLKN's competition here
FLXS vs TILE Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while TILE trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check TILE's competition here
FLXS vs AMWD Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 810.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while AMWD trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AMWD's competition here
FLXS vs ETD Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 759.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while ETD trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ETD's competition here
FLXS vs LOVE Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while LOVE trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LOVE's competition here
FLXS vs HBB Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while HBB trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HBB's competition here
FLXS vs COOK Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while COOK trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check COOK's competition here
FLXS vs VIOT Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while VIOT trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIOT's competition here
FLXS vs SNBR Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while SNBR trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SNBR's competition here
FLXS vs KEQU Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while KEQU trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KEQU's competition here
FLXS vs IRBT Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 151.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while IRBT trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check IRBT's competition here
FLXS vs BSET Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while BSET trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check BSET's competition here
FLXS vs VIRC Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while VIRC trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIRC's competition here
FLXS vs HOFT Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while HOFT trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HOFT's competition here
FLXS vs LCUT Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while LCUT trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LCUT's competition here
FLXS vs PRPL Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while PRPL trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PRPL's competition here
FLXS vs NVFY Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while NVFY trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NVFY's competition here
FLXS vs NTZ Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while NTZ trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NTZ's competition here
FLXS vs CRWS Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while CRWS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check CRWS's competition here
FLXS vs NCL Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while NCL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NCL's competition here
FLXS vs ATER Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while ATER trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ATER's competition here
FLXS vs EFOI Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while EFOI trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check EFOI's competition here
FLXS vs FGI Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while FGI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check FGI's competition here
FLXS vs AUVIP Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVIP's competition here
FLXS vs AUVI Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVI's competition here
FLXS vs FGIWW Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 254.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check FGIWW's competition here
FLXS vs KBAL Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KBAL's competition here
FLXS vs WEBR Comparison July 2025
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $36.92, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.33, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WEBR's competition here