FGI Industries Ltd.
FGI Industries Ltd. (FGIWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGIWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGIWW | $0.03 | -13.11% | 254.2K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SN | $120.34 | +1.70% | 16.9B | 38.08 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
| MHK | $120.90 | +4.22% | 7.6B | 15.83 | $7.64 | N/A |
| WHR | $99.74 | +1.14% | 5.5B | 767.35 | $0.13 | +7.04% |
| PATK | $100.00 | +2.48% | 3.3B | 24.04 | $4.16 | +1.95% |
| LZB | $38.39 | +1.05% | 1.6B | 16.33 | $2.35 | +2.24% |
| MBC | $11.87 | +1.98% | 1.5B | 15.44 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $10.33 | +0.78% | 1.4B | -2.76 | -$3.74 | +1.94% |
| MLKN | $20.17 | +2.07% | 1.4B | -37.35 | -$0.54 | +3.72% |
Stock Comparison
FGIWW vs SN Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while SN trades at $120.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check SN's competition here
FGIWW vs TPX Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check TPX's competition here
FGIWW vs MHK Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while MHK trades at $120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check MHK's competition here
FGIWW vs WHR Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while WHR trades at $99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 767.35. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check WHR's competition here
FGIWW vs PATK Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while PATK trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check PATK's competition here
FGIWW vs LZB Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while LZB trades at $38.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check LZB's competition here
FGIWW vs MBC Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while MBC trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check MBC's competition here
FGIWW vs LEG Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while LEG trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check LEG's competition here
FGIWW vs MLKN Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while MLKN trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -37.35. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check MLKN's competition here
FGIWW vs TILE Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while TILE trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check TILE's competition here
FGIWW vs AMWD Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 810.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while AMWD trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check AMWD's competition here
FGIWW vs ETD Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 759.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while ETD trades at $29.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check ETD's competition here
FGIWW vs LOVE Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while LOVE trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check LOVE's competition here
FGIWW vs HBB Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while HBB trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check HBB's competition here
FGIWW vs COOK Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while COOK trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check COOK's competition here
FGIWW vs VIOT Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while VIOT trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check VIOT's competition here
FGIWW vs FLXS Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 194.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while FLXS trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check FLXS's competition here
FGIWW vs SNBR Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while SNBR trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check SNBR's competition here
FGIWW vs KEQU Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while KEQU trades at $58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check KEQU's competition here
FGIWW vs IRBT Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 151.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while IRBT trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check IRBT's competition here
FGIWW vs BSET Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while BSET trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check BSET's competition here
FGIWW vs VIRC Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while VIRC trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check VIRC's competition here
FGIWW vs HOFT Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while HOFT trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check HOFT's competition here
FGIWW vs LCUT Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while LCUT trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check LCUT's competition here
FGIWW vs PRPL Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while PRPL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check PRPL's competition here
FGIWW vs NVFY Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while NVFY trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check NVFY's competition here
FGIWW vs NTZ Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while NTZ trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check NTZ's competition here
FGIWW vs CRWS Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while CRWS trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check CRWS's competition here
FGIWW vs NCL Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while NCL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check NCL's competition here
FGIWW vs ATER Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while ATER trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check ATER's competition here
FGIWW vs EFOI Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while EFOI trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check EFOI's competition here
FGIWW vs FGI Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while FGI trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check FGI's competition here
FGIWW vs AUVIP Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check AUVIP's competition here
FGIWW vs AUVI Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check AUVI's competition here
FGIWW vs KBAL Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check KBAL's competition here
FGIWW vs WEBR Comparison July 2025
FGIWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGIWW stands at 254.2K. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGIWW is priced at $0.03, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGIWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGIWW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FGIWW is less volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGIWW.Check WEBR's competition here