Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants (FBYDW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FBYDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBYDW | $0.91 | -20.87% | 906.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HON | $223.12 | -0.87% | 140.8B | 25.20 | $8.80 | +2.02% |
| MMM | $148.40 | -2.40% | 80.9B | 21.06 | $7.21 | +1.89% |
| VMI | $365.10 | +2.03% | 7.3B | 33.55 | $10.81 | +0.71% |
| IEP | $9.29 | +0.16% | 5.1B | -5.73 | -$1.64 | +26.54% |
| GFF | $82.99 | +0.99% | 3.9B | 17.09 | $4.83 | +0.84% |
| MDU | $17.13 | +1.51% | 3.5B | 18.73 | $0.91 | +2.72% |
| SEB | $3,239.89 | +3.60% | 3.1B | 31.28 | $101.01 | +0.29% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $24.98 | -1.96% | 2.3B | -72.03 | -$0.35 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
FBYDW vs HON Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while HON trades at $223.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check HON's competition here
FBYDW vs MMM Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while MMM trades at $148.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MMM's competition here
FBYDW vs VMI Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while VMI trades at $365.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check VMI's competition here
FBYDW vs IEP Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while IEP trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IEP's competition here
FBYDW vs GFF Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while GFF trades at $82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check GFF's competition here
FBYDW vs MDU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while MDU trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MDU's competition here
FBYDW vs SEB Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while SEB trades at $3,239.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SEB's competition here
FBYDW vs VRTV Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check VRTV's competition here
FBYDW vs BBU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while BBU trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -72.03. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check BBU's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PC Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PC trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PC's competition here
FBYDW vs SPLP Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 804.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while SPLP trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SPLP's competition here
FBYDW vs MATW Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while MATW trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MATW's competition here
FBYDW vs CRESY Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 726.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CRESY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CRESY's competition here
FBYDW vs FIP Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 718.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while FIP trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FIP's competition here
FBYDW vs CRESW Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CRESW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW and CRESW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRESW's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PA Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 526.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PA trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PA's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PB Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 506.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PB trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PB's competition here
FBYDW vs TRC Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 501.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while TRC trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 233.25. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check TRC's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 490.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while CODI trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI's competition here
FBYDW vs SPLP-PA Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
FBYDW vs FIPWV Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FIPWV's competition here
FBYDW vs FBYD Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while FBYD trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 743.00. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FBYD's competition here
FBYDW vs RCMT Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while RCMT trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check RCMT's competition here
FBYDW vs TUSK Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while TUSK trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check TUSK's competition here
FBYDW vs IRS Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while IRS trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IRS's competition here
FBYDW vs NNBR Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while NNBR trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check NNBR's competition here
FBYDW vs IGC Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while IGC trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IGC's competition here
FBYDW vs EFSH Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check EFSH's competition here
FBYDW vs DOTAU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW and DOTAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOTAU's competition here
FBYDW vs OBCI Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check OBCI's competition here
FBYDW vs FNTEU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FNTEU's competition here
FBYDW vs STLRU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW and STLRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STLRU's competition here
FBYDW vs JBK Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while JBK trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW and JBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JBK's competition here
FBYDW vs ELECU Comparison July 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 906.6M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.91, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW and ELECU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELECU's competition here