Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants FBYDW Peers
See (FBYDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBYDW | $0.88 | +8.64% | 685.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HON | $239.26 | +0.21% | 153.8B | 27.53 | $8.69 | +1.88% |
| MMM | $153.97 | +0.10% | 82.8B | 19.15 | $8.04 | +1.86% |
| VMI | $341.26 | +1.81% | 6.8B | 19.87 | $17.17 | +0.75% |
| IEP | $8.53 | +2.65% | 4.7B | -5.21 | -$1.64 | +29.31% |
| GFF | $77.60 | +2.09% | 3.7B | 16.07 | $4.83 | +0.89% |
| MDU | $16.69 | -0.48% | 3.4B | 18.36 | $0.91 | +2.78% |
| SEB | $3,016.63 | +3.47% | 2.9B | 30.02 | $100.94 | +0.30% |
| BBU | $26.17 | +0.11% | 2.3B | -74.69 | -$0.35 | +0.95% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FBYDW vs HON Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 153.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while HON trades at $239.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs MMM Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while MMM trades at $153.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs VMI Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while VMI trades at $341.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs IEP Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while IEP trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs GFF Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while GFF trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs MDU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while MDU trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs SEB Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while SEB trades at $3,016.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs BBU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while BBU trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -74.69. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs VRTV Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CODI-PC Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CODI-PC trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs MATW Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 794.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while MATW trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs FIP Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 735M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while FIP trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs SPLP Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 709.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while SPLP trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CRESY Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 663.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CRESY trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CRESW Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 515.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CRESW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CODI-PA Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 507M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CODI-PA trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CODI-PB Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CODI-PB trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs CODI Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while CODI trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs TRC Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 476.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while TRC trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 221.63. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs SPLP-PA Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs FIPWV Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs FBYD Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while FBYD trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 570.00. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs RCMT Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while RCMT trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs TUSK Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while TUSK trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs NNBR Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while NNBR trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs IRS Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while IRS trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs IGC Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while IGC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs EFSH Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs DOTAU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs JBK Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while JBK trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs ELECU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs FNTEU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs OBCI Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.
FBYDW vs STLRU Comparison
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 685.1M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.88, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.