Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants (FBYDW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FBYDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBYDW | $0.78 | +0.00% | 777.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HON | $217.42 | +0.19% | 138B | 24.73 | $8.79 | +2.08% |
| MMM | $154.38 | -0.24% | 82.2B | 21.44 | $7.20 | +1.85% |
| VMI | $363.84 | -0.10% | 7.2B | 33.75 | $10.78 | +0.70% |
| IEP | $8.31 | -1.95% | 4.8B | -6.92 | -$1.20 | +23.97% |
| SEB | $3,610.08 | +2.03% | 3.4B | 25.05 | $143.30 | +0.25% |
| GFF | $72.27 | +0.19% | 3.4B | 49.90 | $1.45 | +0.95% |
| MDU | $16.35 | -0.21% | 3.3B | 18.57 | $0.88 | +2.80% |
| BBU | $27.06 | -0.62% | 2.4B | -194.07 | -$0.14 | +0.92% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FBYDW vs HON Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while HON trades at $217.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check HON's competition here
FBYDW vs MMM Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while MMM trades at $154.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MMM's competition here
FBYDW vs VMI Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while VMI trades at $363.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check VMI's competition here
FBYDW vs IEP Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while IEP trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IEP's competition here
FBYDW vs SEB Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while SEB trades at $3,610.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SEB's competition here
FBYDW vs GFF Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while GFF trades at $72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to GFF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check GFF's competition here
FBYDW vs MDU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while MDU trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MDU's competition here
FBYDW vs BBU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while BBU trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -194.07. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check BBU's competition here
FBYDW vs VRTV Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check VRTV's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PC Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CODI-PC trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PC's competition here
FBYDW vs SPLP Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 819.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while SPLP trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SPLP's competition here
FBYDW vs MATW Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 730.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while MATW trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check MATW's competition here
FBYDW vs CRESY Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CRESY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CRESY's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PB Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CODI-PB trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PB's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI-PA Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 566.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CODI-PA trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI-PA's competition here
FBYDW vs CODI Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CODI trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CODI's competition here
FBYDW vs FIP Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 523.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while FIP trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FIP's competition here
FBYDW vs CRESW Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while CRESW trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check CRESW's competition here
FBYDW vs TRC Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 465.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while TRC trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is -864.75. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check TRC's competition here
FBYDW vs SPLP-PA Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
FBYDW vs FIPWV Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FIPWV's competition here
FBYDW vs FBYD Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while FBYD trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FBYD's competition here
FBYDW vs RCMT Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while RCMT trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check RCMT's competition here
FBYDW vs NNBR Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while NNBR trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check NNBR's competition here
FBYDW vs IRS Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while IRS trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IRS's competition here
FBYDW vs TUSK Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while TUSK trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check TUSK's competition here
FBYDW vs IGC Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while IGC trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IGC's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check IGC's competition here
FBYDW vs EFSH Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check EFSH's competition here
FBYDW vs DOTAU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check DOTAU's competition here
FBYDW vs JBK Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while JBK trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check JBK's competition here
FBYDW vs OBCI Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check OBCI's competition here
FBYDW vs ELECU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check ELECU's competition here
FBYDW vs STLRU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check STLRU's competition here
FBYDW vs FNTEU Comparison August 2025
FBYDW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBYDW stands at 777.1M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBYDW is priced at $0.78, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBYDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBYDW's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBYDW is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBYDW.Check FNTEU's competition here