Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.
Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. FBHS Peers
See (FBHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | N/A |
| TT | $432.29 | +0.72% | 96.4B | 35.63 | $12.13 | +0.83% |
| JCI | $105.07 | +0.60% | 69.1B | 31.74 | $3.31 | +1.41% |
| CARR | $73.67 | +1.49% | 63.1B | 49.10 | $1.50 | +1.13% |
| LII | $567.49 | +0.53% | 20.1B | 25.30 | $22.42 | +0.61% |
| CSL | $374.34 | -0.70% | 16.2B | 20.84 | $17.96 | +1.07% |
| MAS | $64.17 | +0.67% | 13.5B | 17.53 | $3.66 | +1.88% |
| BLDR | $117.01 | +0.89% | 12.9B | 15.02 | $7.80 | N/A |
| OC | $138.02 | +0.58% | 11.7B | 19.28 | $7.16 | +1.88% |
| WMS | $115.97 | +0.13% | 9B | 20.13 | $5.76 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
FBHS vs TT Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TT trades at $432.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JCI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JCI trades at $105.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CARR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CARR trades at $73.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 49.10. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs LII Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while LII trades at $567.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LII's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CSL Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSL trades at $374.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs MAS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while MAS trades at $64.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAS's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BLDR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BLDR trades at $117.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs OC Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while OC trades at $138.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs WMS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while WMS trades at $115.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AZEK Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AZEK trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 53.27. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BECN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AWI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AWI trades at $163.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs SSD Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SSD trades at $157.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs FBIN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FBIN trades at $51.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AAON Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AAON trades at $73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs TREX Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TREX trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs IBP Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while IBP trades at $178.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs GMS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while GMS trades at $97.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs DOOR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PGTI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ROCK Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ROCK trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JBI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JBI trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs APOG Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 905.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APOG trades at $41.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs NX Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 885.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while NX trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs SWIM Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 765.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SWIM trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -50.62. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BXC Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 596.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BXC trades at $74.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ASPN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ASPN trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JELD Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JELD trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PPIH Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PPIH trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PHOE Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PHOE trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CSTE Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSTE trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs APT Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APT trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AIRJW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AIRJW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ILAG Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ILAG trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AEHL Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AEHL trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs VIEW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs VIEWW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs FRTA Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AFI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.