Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.
Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. FBHS Peers
See (FBHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | N/A |
| TT | $431.15 | -0.34% | 96.2B | 35.46 | $12.16 | +0.80% |
| JCI | $102.32 | -0.01% | 67.3B | 30.91 | $3.31 | +1.45% |
| CARR | $71.41 | +0.03% | 61.2B | 47.61 | $1.50 | +1.16% |
| LII | $550.44 | -1.97% | 19.5B | 24.54 | $22.43 | +0.83% |
| CSL | $378.58 | -0.86% | 16.4B | 21.11 | $17.93 | +1.05% |
| MAS | $63.33 | -0.05% | 13.4B | 17.30 | $3.66 | +1.90% |
| BLDR | $113.41 | +0.60% | 12.5B | 14.54 | $7.80 | N/A |
| OC | $135.51 | -0.75% | 11.5B | 18.93 | $7.16 | +1.91% |
| WMS | $114.94 | +1.58% | 8.9B | 19.95 | $5.76 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
FBHS vs TT Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TT trades at $431.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JCI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JCI trades at $102.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CARR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CARR trades at $71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 47.61. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs LII Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while LII trades at $550.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LII's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CSL Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSL trades at $378.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs MAS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while MAS trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAS's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BLDR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BLDR trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs OC Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while OC trades at $135.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs WMS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while WMS trades at $114.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AZEK Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AZEK trades at $53.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.12. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BECN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AAON Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AAON trades at $94.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 49.66. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AWI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AWI trades at $155.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs SSD Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SSD trades at $159.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs FBIN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FBIN trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs TREX Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TREX trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs IBP Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while IBP trades at $169.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs GMS Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while GMS trades at $78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs DOOR Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PGTI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ROCK Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ROCK trades at $59.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JBI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JBI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs APOG Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 838.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APOG trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs NX Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while NX trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 43.77. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs SWIM Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 674.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SWIM trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -44.62. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs BXC Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 535.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BXC trades at $66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ASPN Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ASPN trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs JELD Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 329.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JELD trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AIRJW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AIRJW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PPIH Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PPIH trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs PHOE Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PHOE trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 60.33. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs CSTE Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSTE trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs APT Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APT trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs ILAG Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ILAG trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AEHL Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AEHL trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs VIEW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs VIEWW Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs AFI Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.
FBHS vs FRTA Comparison
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.