Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.
Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (FBHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FBHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| TT | $463.69 | +0.00% | 103.5B | 35.58 | $13.12 | +0.81% |
| JCI | $142.70 | +0.00% | 88B | 48.26 | $2.98 | +1.07% |
| CARR | $62.92 | +0.00% | 53.6B | 37.95 | $1.69 | +1.43% |
| LII | $550.32 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 24.66 | $22.76 | +0.90% |
| CSL | $407.65 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 23.81 | $17.18 | +1.05% |
| MAS | $75.07 | +0.43% | 15.3B | 19.47 | $3.86 | +1.66% |
| WMS | $171.12 | +0.00% | 13.3B | 28.40 | $6.01 | +0.41% |
| BLDR | $111.42 | +0.00% | 12.2B | 21.41 | $5.16 | N/A |
| OC | $131.68 | +0.00% | 10.9B | -154.30 | -$0.86 | +2.15% |
Stock Comparison
FBHS vs TT Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TT trades at $463.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check TT's competition here
FBHS vs JCI Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JCI trades at $142.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 48.26. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check JCI's competition here
FBHS vs CARR Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CARR trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check CARR's competition here
FBHS vs LII Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while LII trades at $550.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check LII's competition here
FBHS vs CSL Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSL trades at $407.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check CSL's competition here
FBHS vs MAS Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while MAS trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check MAS's competition here
FBHS vs WMS Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while WMS trades at $171.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check WMS's competition here
FBHS vs BLDR Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BLDR trades at $111.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BLDR's competition here
FBHS vs OC Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while OC trades at $131.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -154.30. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check OC's competition here
FBHS vs AWI Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AWI trades at $196.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AWI's competition here
FBHS vs AAON Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AAON trades at $101.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 84.55. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AAON's competition here
FBHS vs SSD Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SSD trades at $200.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SSD's competition here
FBHS vs AZEK Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AZEK's competition here
FBHS vs BECN Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BECN's competition here
FBHS vs FBIN Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FBIN trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check FBIN's competition here
FBHS vs TREX Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TREX trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check TREX's competition here
FBHS vs GMS Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check GMS's competition here
FBHS vs DOOR Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check DOOR's competition here
FBHS vs PGTI Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PGTI's competition here
FBHS vs ROCK Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ROCK trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ROCK's competition here
FBHS vs NX Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while NX trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check NX's competition here
FBHS vs JBI Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JBI trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check JBI's competition here
FBHS vs APOG Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 882.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APOG trades at $40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check APOG's competition here
FBHS vs SWIM Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 804.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SWIM trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SWIM's competition here
FBHS vs BXC Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 570.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BXC trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BXC's competition here
FBHS vs PHOE Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PHOE trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 313.80. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PHOE's competition here
FBHS vs ASPN Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ASPN trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ASPN's competition here
FBHS vs PPIH Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PPIH trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PPIH's competition here
FBHS vs JELD Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JELD trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check JELD's competition here
FBHS vs CSTE Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSTE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check CSTE's competition here
FBHS vs APT Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APT trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check APT's competition here
FBHS vs AIRJW Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AIRJW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AIRJW's competition here
FBHS vs SMJF Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SMJF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SMJF's competition here
FBHS vs ILAG Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ILAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ILAG's competition here
FBHS vs AEHL Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AEHL trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AEHL's competition here
FBHS vs VIEW Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check VIEW's competition here
FBHS vs VIEWW Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check VIEWW's competition here
FBHS vs FRTA Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check FRTA's competition here
FBHS vs AFI Comparison February 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AFI's competition here