Faze Three Limited
Faze Three Limited (FAZE3Q.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAZE3Q.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAZE3Q.NS | ₹558.40 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 42.65 | ₹12.94 | N/A |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹32,595.00 | +0.00% | 365.7B | 48.92 | ₹670.33 | +1.83% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹32,642.20 | +0.00% | 365.5B | 48.89 | ₹670.24 | +1.83% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹911.80 | +0.00% | 319.1B | 37.82 | ₹24.68 | +0.54% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹910.80 | +0.00% | 318.6B | 37.76 | ₹24.68 | +0.54% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| VTL.BO | ₹523.05 | +0.00% | 155.2B | 19.14 | ₹28.04 | +0.93% |
| VTL.NS | ₹522.75 | +0.00% | 155.2B | 19.14 | ₹28.03 | +0.93% |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| WELSPUNLIV.BO | ₹137.60 | +0.00% | 131B | 55.96 | ₹2.45 | +1.24% |
Stock Comparison
FAZE3Q.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 365.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹32,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 365.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹32,642.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.89. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 319.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹911.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 318.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹910.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while VTL.BO trades at ₹523.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while VTL.NS trades at ₹522.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 131B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹137.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹137.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹403.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹426.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹365.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹365.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹70.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹70.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,557.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,555.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹660.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹661.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹468.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -362.20. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹468.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -362.08. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹295.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹296.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹776.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹775.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹921.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.77. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹921.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹190.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹190.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹518.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹950.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹949.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹394.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 50.64. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹393.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹548.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹547.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹570.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹569.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹282.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹116.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 137.39. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹116.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹281.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹466.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹378.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹376.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹752.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹750.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹729.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹732.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹347.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹303.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹304.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹107.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹107.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹560.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 57.07. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹574.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹575.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUPA.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹143.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹199.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 881.36. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹197.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 805.29. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹444.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹444.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,348.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,349.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹80.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹81.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹207.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹208.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹153.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 91.44. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs DIGJAMLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹153.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 89.88. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹83.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹83.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹197.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,069.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,073.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PRECOT.NS Comparison February 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹558.40, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹483.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.65, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is more volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here