Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued
Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued ESEAV Peers
See (ESEAV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESEAV | $27.85 | +7.12% | 194.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEX | $113.41 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 22.79 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $111.35 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 7.59 | $15.07 | +1.19% |
| SB-PC | $25.70 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.11 | $1.51 | +5.48% |
| SB-PD | $25.50 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 16.94 | $1.51 | +5.48% |
| HAFN | $4.99 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 4.17 | $1.20 | +18.28% |
| SBLK | $17.25 | +0.00% | 2B | 9.10 | $1.91 | +8.33% |
| ZIM | $16.09 | +0.00% | 2B | 0.89 | $18.21 | +52.62% |
| CDLR | $19.87 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 17.33 | $1.20 | N/A |
| BWLP | $11.83 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 6.32 | $1.87 | +14.37% |
Stock Comparison
ESEAV vs KEX Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while KEX trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs MATX Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while MATX trades at $111.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SB-PC Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SB-PC trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SB-PD Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SB-PD trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs HAFN Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while HAFN trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SBLK Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SBLK trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs ZIM Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while ZIM trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CDLR Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CDLR trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CDLR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs BWLP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while BWLP trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMBT Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMBT trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs DAC Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while DAC trades at $86.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GOGL Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GOGL trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CCEC Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CCEC trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SBBA Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SFL Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SFL trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMRE-PC Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMRE-PD Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMRE-PB Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NMM Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NMM trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMRE Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMRE trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMRE-PE Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CPLP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GSL Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 932.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GSL trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GSL-PB Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 923.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GSL-PB trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs ECO Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 699.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while ECO trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GNK Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 570.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GNK trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NAT Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 553.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NAT trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GRIN Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 501.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GRIN trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is -52.02. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NETI Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs ASC Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while ASC trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SB Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SB trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CLCO Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CLCO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs ESEA Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while ESEA trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs PANL Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while PANL trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs HSHP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while HSHP trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GASS Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GASS trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs KNOP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while KNOP trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CMDB Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CMDB trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs DSX-PB Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while DSX-PB trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs DSX Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while DSX trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SMHI Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SMHI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SHIP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SHIP trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NCT Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NCT trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs HMR Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while HMR trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to HMR's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs UFG Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while UFG trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 222.00. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NM Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs PXSAP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs EHLDV Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs TORO Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while TORO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NM-PG Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs PXS Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while PXS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs EDRY Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while EDRY trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs TOPS Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while TOPS trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CACO Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs GLBS Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while GLBS trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs HTCO Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while HTCO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs NM-PH Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs EHLD Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while EHLD trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs PSHG Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while PSHG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CTRM Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CTRM trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs USEA Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while USEA trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs OP Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while OP trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs ICON Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while ICON trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs EGLE Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while EGLE trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs CISS Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while CISS trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CISS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs PXSAW Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 240.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while PXSAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SHIPW Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SBLKZ Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs TOROV Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.
ESEAV vs SHIPZ Comparison
ESEAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESEAV stands at 194.8M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESEAV is priced at $27.85, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESEAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ESEAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESEAV is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESEAV.