Empire State Realty OP, L.P.
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (ESBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ESBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESBA | $5.05 | +0.20% | 1.3B | 20.20 | $0.25 | +2.71% |
| DLR | $179.61 | +0.24% | 61.7B | 50.17 | $3.58 | +2.71% |
| DLR-PK | $22.76 | -0.33% | 53.9B | 4.71 | $4.83 | +2.71% |
| ARE | $48.41 | -3.66% | 8.4B | -5.74 | -$8.44 | +9.62% |
| BXP | $52.01 | -1.37% | 8.2B | 29.88 | $1.74 | +6.45% |
| DLR-PL | $19.79 | -0.63% | 6.8B | 4.10 | $4.83 | +2.71% |
| VNO-PL | $16.99 | -0.09% | 6.8B | 26.38 | $0.64 | +2.85% |
| VNO-PM | $16.57 | -0.90% | 6.7B | 25.73 | $0.64 | +2.85% |
| HPP-PC | $13.40 | -1.62% | 5.1B | -108.06 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $25.95 | -0.35% | 4.9B | 6.18 | $4.20 | +2.85% |
Stock Comparison
ESBA vs DLR Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DLR trades at $179.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 50.17. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DLR's competition here
ESBA vs DLR-PK Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DLR-PK trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DLR-PK's competition here
ESBA vs ARE Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while ARE trades at $48.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check ARE's competition here
ESBA vs BXP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while BXP trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check BXP's competition here
ESBA vs DLR-PL Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DLR-PL trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DLR-PL's competition here
ESBA vs VNO-PL Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while VNO-PL trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check VNO-PL's competition here
ESBA vs VNO-PM Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while VNO-PM trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check VNO-PM's competition here
ESBA vs HPP-PC Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while HPP-PC trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -108.06. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check HPP-PC's competition here
ESBA vs VNO Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while VNO trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check VNO's competition here
ESBA vs SLG-PI Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while SLG-PI trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check SLG-PI's competition here
ESBA vs CUZ Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CUZ trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 94.92. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CUZ's competition here
ESBA vs CDP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CDP trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CDP's competition here
ESBA vs KRC Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while KRC trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check KRC's competition here
ESBA vs VNO-PN Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while VNO-PN trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check VNO-PN's competition here
ESBA vs VNO-PO Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while VNO-PO trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check VNO-PO's competition here
ESBA vs SLG Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while SLG trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.12. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check SLG's competition here
ESBA vs HIW Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while HIW trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check HIW's competition here
ESBA vs CLI Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CLI's competition here
ESBA vs DEI Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DEI trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 108.28. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DEI's competition here
ESBA vs WRE Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check WRE's competition here
ESBA vs PGRE Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check PGRE's competition here
ESBA vs FISK Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while FISK trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check FISK's competition here
ESBA vs OGCP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while OGCP trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check OGCP's competition here
ESBA vs DEA Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DEA trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 81.52. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DEA's competition here
ESBA vs JBGS Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 843.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while JBGS trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check JBGS's competition here
ESBA vs PDM Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 827.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while PDM trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check PDM's competition here
ESBA vs CXP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CXP's competition here
ESBA vs PSTL Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 666.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while PSTL trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check PSTL's competition here
ESBA vs BDN Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while BDN trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check BDN's competition here
ESBA vs HPP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while HPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check HPP's competition here
ESBA vs CIO-PA Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CIO-PA's competition here
ESBA vs CIO Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CIO's competition here
ESBA vs OPINL Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check OPINL's competition here
ESBA vs NLOP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while NLOP trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check NLOP's competition here
ESBA vs ELME Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while ELME trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check ELME's competition here
ESBA vs EQC Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check EQC's competition here
ESBA vs ONL Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while ONL trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check ONL's competition here
ESBA vs FSP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while FSP trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check FSP's competition here
ESBA vs NYC Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while NYC trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check NYC's competition here
ESBA vs OPI Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check OPI's competition here
ESBA vs EQC-PD Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check EQC-PD's competition here
ESBA vs CMCT Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 501.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CMCT trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CMCT's competition here
ESBA vs OFC Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check OFC's competition here
ESBA vs CMCTP Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check CMCTP's competition here
ESBA vs DTLA-P Comparison March 2026
ESBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESBA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ESBA is priced at $5.05, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESBA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.20, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESBA is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESBA.Check DTLA-P's competition here