The Eastern Company
The Eastern Company EML Peers
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $23.06 | -2.45% | 141.7M | 11.36 | $2.03 | +1.89% |
| SNA | $309.83 | -2.93% | 16.2B | 16.14 | $19.20 | +2.67% |
| RBC | $369.94 | -0.49% | 11.6B | 48.04 | $7.70 | N/A |
| LECO | $201.40 | -1.45% | 11.2B | 24.80 | $8.12 | +1.45% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 10.3B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +5.01% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| SWK | $65.27 | -3.18% | 10.1B | 27.66 | $2.36 | +5.01% |
| TTC | $67.34 | -3.46% | 6.6B | 17.22 | $3.91 | +2.20% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
| TKR | $70.70 | -1.89% | 4.9B | 15.24 | $4.64 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
EML vs SNA Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while SNA trades at $309.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs RBC Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while RBC trades at $369.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs LECO Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while LECO trades at $201.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SWH Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs ROLLP Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SWK Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while SWK trades at $65.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TTC Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while TTC trades at $67.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs ROLL Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TKR Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while TKR trades at $70.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs RBCP Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs KMT Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while KMT trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs HLMN Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while HLMN trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 68.60. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SCX Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs PFIN Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs CVR Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while CVR trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TBLT Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 141.7M. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.06, while TBLT trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.