The Eastern Company
The Eastern Company EML Peers
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $23.52 | +0.00% | 145.7M | 11.29 | $2.10 | +1.86% |
| SNA | $320.10 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 16.82 | $19.12 | +2.57% |
| RBC | $383.13 | +0.00% | 12.2B | 50.40 | $7.71 | N/A |
| LECO | $213.85 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 26.67 | $8.11 | +1.37% |
| SWK | $71.56 | +0.00% | 11B | 30.13 | $2.36 | +4.61% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 10B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +4.61% |
| TTC | $74.60 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 19.16 | $3.89 | +2.01% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
| TKR | $76.72 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 16.52 | $4.64 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
EML vs SNA Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while SNA trades at $320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs RBC Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while RBC trades at $383.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs LECO Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while LECO trades at $213.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SWK Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while SWK trades at $71.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs ROLLP Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SWH Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TTC Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while TTC trades at $74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs ROLL Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TKR Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while TKR trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs RBCP Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs KMT Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while KMT trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs HLMN Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while HLMN trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs SCX Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs PFIN Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs CVR Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while CVR trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.
EML vs TBLT Comparison
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $23.52, while TBLT trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.