The Eastern Company
The Eastern Company (EML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | $19.76 | -0.40% | 119.4M | 21.02 | $0.94 | +2.23% |
| SNA | $359.04 | -0.82% | 18.7B | 18.69 | $19.21 | +2.56% |
| RBC | $532.25 | -3.04% | 16.8B | 62.62 | $8.50 | N/A |
| LECO | $248.00 | -1.38% | 13.6B | 26.64 | $9.31 | +1.23% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +4.81% |
| SWK | $68.82 | -2.81% | 10.7B | 25.98 | $2.65 | +4.81% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TTC | $92.30 | -1.61% | 9B | 27.65 | $3.34 | +1.66% |
| TKR | $97.56 | -1.51% | 6.8B | 23.72 | $4.11 | +1.43% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EML vs SNA Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SNA trades at $359.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SNA's competition here
EML vs RBC Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while RBC trades at $532.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 62.62. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBC's competition here
EML vs LECO Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while LECO trades at $248.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check LECO's competition here
EML vs SWH Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWH's competition here
EML vs SWK Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SWK trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWK's competition here
EML vs ROLLP Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLLP's competition here
EML vs TTC Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while TTC trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TTC's competition here
EML vs TKR Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while TKR trades at $97.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TKR's competition here
EML vs ROLL Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check ROLL's competition here
EML vs RBCP Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check RBCP's competition here
EML vs KMT Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while KMT trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check KMT's competition here
EML vs HLMN Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while HLMN trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check HLMN's competition here
EML vs SCX Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCX's competition here
EML vs SCAG Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SCAG trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCAG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SCAG's competition here
EML vs PFIN Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check PFIN's competition here
EML vs CVR Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while CVR trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check CVR's competition here
EML vs TBLT Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 289. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while TBLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is more volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLT's competition here
EML vs SWT Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check SWT's competition here
EML vs TBLTW Comparison March 2026
EML plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EML stands at 119.4M. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EML is priced at $19.76, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EML currently has a P/E ratio of 21.02, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EML's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EML is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EML.Check TBLTW's competition here