Envela Corporation
Envela Corporation ELA Peers
See (ELA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELA | $6.12 | +5.70% | 158.3M | 21.00 | $0.29 | N/A |
| TPR | $87.81 | +0.80% | 18.2B | 23.11 | $3.80 | +1.60% |
| SIG | $79.55 | -3.41% | 3.3B | 91.40 | $0.87 | +1.50% |
| CPRI | $17.70 | +0.68% | 2.1B | -1.77 | -$10.00 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| REAL | $4.79 | -2.04% | 541.7M | -4.44 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| LANV | $2.19 | +7.35% | 306.1M | -1.34 | -$1.64 | N/A |
| TOPW | $10.33 | +1.57% | 256.8M | -1033.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MOV | $15.25 | -1.42% | 240M | 19.50 | $0.78 | +9.12% |
| BRLT | $1.38 | -0.72% | 137.1M | -138.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ELA vs TPR Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while TPR trades at $87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs SIG Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while SIG trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 91.40. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs CPRI Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while CPRI trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs MYTE Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs REAL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while REAL trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs LANV Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while LANV trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANV's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs TOPW Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while TOPW trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -1033.00. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs MOV Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while MOV trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs BRLT Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while BRLT trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -129.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs FMFC Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 84.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while FMFC trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is 78.17. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FMFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs FOSL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while FOSL trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs FOSLL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while FOSLL trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs BGI Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while BGI trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs CTHR Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while CTHR trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs JEWL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 158.3M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 380.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.12, while JEWL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.00, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +29.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.