Envela Corporation
Envela Corporation ELA Peers
See (ELA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELA | $6.53 | +3.32% | 169.75M | 22.52 | $0.29 | N/A |
| TPR | $82.82 | -0.50% | 17.20B | 21.79 | $3.80 | +1.69% |
| CPRI | $18.57 | +0.43% | 2.19B | -2.17 | -$8.57 | N/A |
| SIG | $49.36 | +2.96% | 2.15B | 5.77 | $8.55 | +1.79% |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1.04B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| REAL | $5.48 | +3.98% | 619.76M | -5.07 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| LANV | $2.40 | +4.35% | 335.46M | -1.54 | -$1.56 | N/A |
| MOV | $17.36 | +1.55% | 273.84M | 21.43 | $0.81 | +8.09% |
| TOPW | $7.77 | +3.60% | 193.19M | -777.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BRLT | $1.35 | -11.18% | 134.07M | -135.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ELA vs TPR Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 17.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while TPR trades at $82.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs CPRI Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while CPRI trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs SIG Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while SIG trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs MYTE Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MYTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs REAL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 619.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while REAL trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs LANV Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 335.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while LANV trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANV's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs MOV Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 273.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while MOV trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs TOPW Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 193.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while TOPW trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -777.00. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOPW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs BRLT Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 134.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while BRLT trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs FOSL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 85.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while FOSL trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs FOSLL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 80.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while FOSLL trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs BGI Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 17.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while BGI trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs CTHR Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while CTHR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.
ELA vs JEWL Comparison
ELA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELA stands at 169.75M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 125557.00. Regarding current trading prices, ELA is priced at $6.53, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.52, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +29.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ELA is more volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELA.