Eastern Silk Industries Limited
Eastern Silk Industries Limited (EASTSILK.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EASTSILK.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EASTSILK.BO | ₹27.75 | +4.99% | 2.2B | 154.17 | ₹0.18 | N/A |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹32,290.00 | -2.62% | 365B | 48.75 | ₹671.32 | +1.83% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹32,332.45 | -2.72% | 364.6B | 48.73 | ₹670.89 | +1.83% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹914.05 | -0.66% | 315.4B | 37.35 | ₹24.70 | +0.54% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹915.00 | -0.27% | 315B | 37.34 | ₹24.68 | +0.54% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| VTL.BO | ₹544.65 | +0.95% | 157.8B | 19.44 | ₹28.06 | +0.92% |
| VTL.NS | ₹544.15 | +0.83% | 157.7B | 19.43 | ₹28.06 | +0.92% |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| TRIDENT.BO | ₹25.67 | -0.85% | 132.5B | 32.50 | ₹0.80 | +1.92% |
Stock Comparison
EASTSILK.BO vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 365B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹32,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.75. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹32,332.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.73. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹914.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 315B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs VTL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while VTL.BO trades at ₹544.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check VTL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs VTL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while VTL.NS trades at ₹544.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check VTL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹125.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹373.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹374.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ARVIND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹349.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ARVIND.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹350.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ABFRL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ABFRL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs PGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,554.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs PGIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,552.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹634.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹634.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -354.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -351.12. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹897.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.73. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹899.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 101.88. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ICIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹270.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs ICIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.80. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GOKEX.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹677.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GOKEX.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KITEX.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KITEX.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹183.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -21.89. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KKCL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹507.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs KKCL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹508.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs LUXIND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹902.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs LUXIND.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹905.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹403.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹403.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹531.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹532.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹548.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹464.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹543.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 134.99. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹114.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹466.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹268.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹384.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹384.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GANECOS.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹769.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.01. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GANECOS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹771.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs FILATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs FILATEX.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹325.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SPAL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹692.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SPAL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹688.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹287.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹288.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹116.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹116.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹99.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹199.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -755.96. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -754.63. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹577.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹466.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RUPA.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹140.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RUPA.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹140.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹432.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹35.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,367.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹76.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs DIGJAMLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹202.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹200.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RSWM.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹149.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RSWM.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹149.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 87.03. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹83.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹189.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,062.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO is less volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EASTSILK.BO.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
EASTSILK.BO vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison February 2026
EASTSILK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EASTSILK.BO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EASTSILK.BO is priced at ₹27.75, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,066.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EASTSILK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 154.17, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, EASTSILK.BO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EASTSILK.BO and CHEVIOT.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here