China ZhengTong Auto Services Holdings Limited
China ZhengTong Auto Services Holdings Limited (CZASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CZASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZASF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 101.2M | -0.17 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SIEVF | $209.00 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 26.26 | $7.96 | +27.05% |
| SIETY | $99.75 | -0.25% | 10.6B | 25.13 | $3.97 | +27.77% |
| ATOGF | $29.20 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 104.29 | $0.28 | N/A |
| ZSHGY | $17.01 | -0.29% | 4B | 9.05 | $1.88 | +5.08% |
| IHCPF | $10.23 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 11.00 | $0.93 | +3.64% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +1.78% |
| ZHSHF | $1.35 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 7.11 | $0.19 | +6.40% |
| USSJY | $22.42 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 21.15 | $1.06 | +2.36% |
| CYYHF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 508.2M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +6.55% |
Stock Comparison
CZASF vs SIEVF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SIEVF trades at $209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check SIEVF's competition here
CZASF vs SIETY Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SIETY trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to SIETY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to SIETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check SIETY's competition here
CZASF vs ATOGF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ATOGF trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 104.29. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check ATOGF's competition here
CZASF vs ZSHGY Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ZSHGY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check ZSHGY's competition here
CZASF vs IHCPF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while IHCPF trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check IHCPF's competition here
CZASF vs USSJF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check USSJF's competition here
CZASF vs ZHSHF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ZHSHF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check ZHSHF's competition here
CZASF vs USSJY Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while USSJY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check USSJY's competition here
CZASF vs CYYHF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to CYYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check CYYHF's competition here
CZASF vs KMUXF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to KMUXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check KMUXF's competition here
CZASF vs AOCIF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while AOCIF trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check AOCIF's competition here
CZASF vs PDGNF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to PDGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check PDGNF's competition here
CZASF vs CMEIF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CMEIF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to CMEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check CMEIF's competition here
CZASF vs LKKRF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to LKKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check LKKRF's competition here
CZASF vs VTMTF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to VTMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check VTMTF's competition here
CZASF vs MVXM Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to MVXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check MVXM's competition here
CZASF vs NWAU Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to NWAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check NWAU's competition here
CZASF vs MTPTF Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check MTPTF's competition here
CZASF vs GBXXY Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to GBXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check GBXXY's competition here
CZASF vs PREC Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 228.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check PREC's competition here
CZASF vs KXINW Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check KXINW's competition here
CZASF vs RWGI Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while RWGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check RWGI's competition here
CZASF vs SPMI Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to SPMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check SPMI's competition here
CZASF vs MTAM Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to MTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check MTAM's competition here
CZASF vs LASLY Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is more volatile compared to LASLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check LASLY's competition here
CZASF vs SFTGQ Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check SFTGQ's competition here
CZASF vs CALIQ Comparison August 2025
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 48. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is -15.24%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check CALIQ's competition here