Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CSL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | $342.02 | +3.16% | 13.6B | 19.34 | $17.15 | +1.30% |
| TT | $448.78 | +4.15% | 95.8B | 32.84 | $13.15 | +0.90% |
| JCI | $138.57 | +3.60% | 81.5B | 44.68 | $2.98 | +1.19% |
| CARR | $58.05 | +4.42% | 46.3B | 32.81 | $1.69 | +1.67% |
| LII | $476.58 | +5.07% | 15.8B | 19.81 | $22.78 | +1.16% |
| MAS | $61.98 | +3.84% | 12B | 15.32 | $3.86 | +2.12% |
| WMS | $149.19 | +6.02% | 10.9B | 23.28 | $6.02 | +0.52% |
| BLDR | $83.58 | +1.85% | 8.7B | 20.29 | $3.89 | N/A |
| OC | $112.55 | +5.90% | 8.6B | -46.96 | -$2.24 | +2.81% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
Stock Comparison
CSL vs TT Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while TT trades at $448.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TT's competition here
CSL vs JCI Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while JCI trades at $138.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JCI's competition here
CSL vs CARR Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while CARR trades at $58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check CARR's competition here
CSL vs LII Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while LII trades at $476.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check LII's competition here
CSL vs MAS Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while MAS trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check MAS's competition here
CSL vs WMS Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while WMS trades at $149.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check WMS's competition here
CSL vs BLDR Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while BLDR trades at $83.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BLDR's competition here
CSL vs OC Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while OC trades at $112.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -46.96. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check OC's competition here
CSL vs FBHS Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBHS's competition here
CSL vs AZEK Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AZEK's competition here
CSL vs BECN Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BECN's competition here
CSL vs AWI Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AWI trades at $173.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AWI's competition here
CSL vs SSD Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while SSD trades at $174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SSD's competition here
CSL vs AAON Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AAON trades at $86.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 62.71. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AAON's competition here
CSL vs FBIN Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while FBIN trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBIN's competition here
CSL vs GMS Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check GMS's competition here
CSL vs TREX Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while TREX trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TREX's competition here
CSL vs DOOR Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check DOOR's competition here
CSL vs PGTI Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PGTI's competition here
CSL vs ROCK Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while ROCK trades at $40.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ROCK's competition here
CSL vs NX Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 821.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while NX trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check NX's competition here
CSL vs APOG Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 720.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while APOG trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APOG's competition here
CSL vs JBI Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 699.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while JBI trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JBI's competition here
CSL vs SWIM Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 603.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while SWIM trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SWIM's competition here
CSL vs BXC Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 401.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while BXC trades at $54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 2554.50. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BXC's competition here
CSL vs ASPN Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while ASPN trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ASPN's competition here
CSL vs PHOE Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 295.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while PHOE trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 456.67. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PHOE's competition here
CSL vs PPIH Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while PPIH trades at $32.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PPIH's competition here
CSL vs JELD Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while JELD trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JELD's competition here
CSL vs SMJF Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while SMJF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 111.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SMJF's competition here
CSL vs APT Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while APT trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APT's competition here
CSL vs AIRJW Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AIRJW trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AIRJW's competition here
CSL vs CSTE Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while CSTE trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check CSTE's competition here
CSL vs ILAG Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while ILAG trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ILAG's competition here
CSL vs VIEW Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEW's competition here
CSL vs AEHL Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 655.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AEHL trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AEHL's competition here
CSL vs VIEWW Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEWW's competition here
CSL vs HW Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check HW's competition here
CSL vs FRTA Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FRTA's competition here
CSL vs LAYN Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check LAYN's competition here
CSL vs AFI Comparison April 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $342.02, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.34, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AFI's competition here