Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | $407.65 | -0.33% | 16.7B | 23.34 | $17.16 | +1.07% |
| TT | $463.69 | -0.73% | 102B | 35.06 | $13.12 | +0.82% |
| JCI | $142.70 | -0.76% | 87.4B | 47.93 | $2.98 | +1.08% |
| CARR | $62.92 | -1.90% | 53.1B | 37.56 | $1.69 | +1.44% |
| LII | $550.32 | -1.91% | 19.5B | 24.37 | $22.78 | +0.91% |
| MAS | $75.07 | -0.11% | 15B | 19.13 | $3.86 | +1.68% |
| WMS | $171.12 | +0.30% | 13.1B | 28.03 | $6.01 | +0.41% |
| BLDR | $111.42 | +0.79% | 11.9B | 20.79 | $5.16 | N/A |
| OC | $131.68 | -0.78% | 10.6B | -150.34 | -$0.86 | +2.21% |
| AWI | $196.49 | -1.22% | 8.3B | 27.72 | $6.96 | +0.65% |
Stock Comparison
CSL vs TT Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while TT trades at $463.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TT's competition here
CSL vs JCI Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while JCI trades at $142.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JCI's competition here
CSL vs CARR Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while CARR trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check CARR's competition here
CSL vs LII Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while LII trades at $550.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check LII's competition here
CSL vs MAS Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while MAS trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check MAS's competition here
CSL vs WMS Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while WMS trades at $171.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check WMS's competition here
CSL vs BLDR Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while BLDR trades at $111.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BLDR's competition here
CSL vs OC Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while OC trades at $131.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -150.34. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check OC's competition here
CSL vs AWI Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AWI trades at $196.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AWI's competition here
CSL vs AAON Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AAON trades at $101.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 83.54. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AAON's competition here
CSL vs SSD Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while SSD trades at $200.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL and SSD have similar daily volatility (2.20).Check SSD's competition here
CSL vs FBHS Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBHS's competition here
CSL vs AZEK Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AZEK's competition here
CSL vs BECN Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BECN's competition here
CSL vs FBIN Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while FBIN trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBIN's competition here
CSL vs TREX Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while TREX trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TREX's competition here
CSL vs GMS Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check GMS's competition here
CSL vs DOOR Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check DOOR's competition here
CSL vs PGTI Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PGTI's competition here
CSL vs ROCK Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while ROCK trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ROCK's competition here
CSL vs NX Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while NX trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check NX's competition here
CSL vs JBI Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 960.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while JBI trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JBI's competition here
CSL vs APOG Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 858.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while APOG trades at $40.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APOG's competition here
CSL vs SWIM Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 775.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while SWIM trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SWIM's competition here
CSL vs BXC Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while BXC trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BXC's competition here
CSL vs PHOE Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while PHOE trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 300.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PHOE's competition here
CSL vs ASPN Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while ASPN trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ASPN's competition here
CSL vs PPIH Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while PPIH trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PPIH's competition here
CSL vs JELD Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while JELD trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JELD's competition here
CSL vs CSTE Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while CSTE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check CSTE's competition here
CSL vs APT Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while APT trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APT's competition here
CSL vs AIRJW Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AIRJW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AIRJW's competition here
CSL vs SMJF Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while SMJF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SMJF's competition here
CSL vs ILAG Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while ILAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ILAG's competition here
CSL vs AEHL Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AEHL trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AEHL's competition here
CSL vs VIEW Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEW's competition here
CSL vs VIEWW Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEWW's competition here
CSL vs AFI Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AFI's competition here
CSL vs FRTA Comparison February 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 16.7B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $407.65, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FRTA's competition here