Credit Suisse Group AG
Credit Suisse Group AG CS Peers
See (CS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | $0.89 | +0.99% | 3.5B | -0.31 | -$2.83 | N/A |
| JPM-PC | $25.12 | -0.28% | 740B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.90% |
| JPM | $265.72 | +1.44% | 738.5B | 13.04 | $20.38 | +1.90% |
| JPM-PD | $24.18 | -0.66% | 737.5B | 1.79 | $13.48 | +1.90% |
| BAC-PL | $1,175.00 | -0.25% | 442.5B | 334.38 | $3.51 | +2.84% |
| BAC | $44.97 | +1.33% | 338.7B | 13.42 | $3.35 | +2.84% |
| BAC-PK | $23.80 | -0.34% | 338B | 6.77 | $3.51 | +2.84% |
| BAC-PB | $24.41 | -0.44% | 337.2B | 6.95 | $3.51 | +2.84% |
| BAC-PE | $22.08 | -0.05% | 336B | 6.28 | $3.51 | +2.84% |
| BML-PL | $20.60 | -0.12% | 333.5B | 5.86 | $3.51 | +2.84% |
Stock Comparison
CS vs JPM-PC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 740B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PC trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 738.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM trades at $265.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM-PD Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 737.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PD trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 442.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PL trades at $1,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 334.38. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 338.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PK Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 338B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PK trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PB Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 337.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PB trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PE Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 336B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PE trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BML-PL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 333.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BML-PL trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BML-PH Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 333.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BML-PH trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BML-PG Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 331.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BML-PG trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BML-PJ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 331.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BML-PJ trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 248.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 247.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PL trades at $1,149.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 237.99. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 245.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PC trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs HSBC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 210.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while HSBC trades at $59.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PQ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PR Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PY Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PY trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs RY Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while RY trades at $127.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PM Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 159.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PM trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs MUFG Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while MUFG trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PN Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 148.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PN trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs C Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while C trades at $78.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas C's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PS Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PS trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PO Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PO trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PQ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BAC-PP Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BAC-PP trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs TD Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while TD trades at $70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs C-PJ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs SAN Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while SAN trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs UBS Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while UBS trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs RY-PT Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs SMFG Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while SMFG trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BBVA Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BBVA trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BMO Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BMO trades at $108.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BNS Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BNS trades at $53.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs BCS Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while BCS trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs ING Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while ING trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs CM Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while CM trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PZ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PA Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PA trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs NU Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while NU trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM-PJ Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WFC-PD Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WFC-PD trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM-PL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PL trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM-PK Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PK trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs JPM-PM Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while JPM-PM trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs C-PK Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs NWG Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while NWG trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs EWBC Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while EWBC trades at $94.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs NTB Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while NTB trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs TANNL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs FRC-PL Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.
CS vs WBK Comparison
CS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CS is priced at $0.89, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, CS's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CS is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.