CRH plc
CRH plc (CRH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH | $113.33 | +2.36% | 76.2B | 23.75 | $4.77 | +1.60% |
| VMC | $292.40 | +1.43% | 38.6B | 40.56 | $7.21 | +0.66% |
| MLM | $607.89 | +1.19% | 36.6B | 33.60 | $18.08 | +0.52% |
| CX | $8.90 | +1.25% | 12.9B | 14.62 | $0.61 | +0.95% |
| JHX | $20.51 | +3.69% | 11.9B | 26.66 | $0.77 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $239.07 | +5.40% | 7.8B | 17.61 | $13.59 | +0.42% |
| KNF | $91.84 | +4.74% | 5.2B | 34.03 | $2.70 | N/A |
| USLM | $121.52 | +6.33% | 3.5B | 27.87 | $4.36 | +0.19% |
| TGLS | $72.82 | +4.03% | 3.4B | 18.72 | $3.89 | +0.76% |
Stock Comparison
CRH vs VMC Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while VMC trades at $292.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check VMC's competition here
CRH vs MLM Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while MLM trades at $607.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check MLM's competition here
CRH vs CX Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while CX trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check CX's competition here
CRH vs JHX Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while JHX trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check JHX's competition here
CRH vs SUM Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check SUM's competition here
CRH vs EXP Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while EXP trades at $239.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check EXP's competition here
CRH vs KNF Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while KNF trades at $91.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check KNF's competition here
CRH vs USLM Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while USLM trades at $121.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check USLM's competition here
CRH vs TGLS Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while TGLS trades at $72.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check TGLS's competition here
CRH vs BCC Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while BCC trades at $91.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check BCC's competition here
CRH vs TTAM Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while TTAM trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check TTAM's competition here
CRH vs LOMA Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while LOMA trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check LOMA's competition here
CRH vs CPAC Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 553.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while CPAC trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check CPAC's competition here
CRH vs SMID Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while SMID trades at $41.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check SMID's competition here
CRH vs FEAM Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while FEAM trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check FEAM's competition here
CRH vs CAPT Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while CAPT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check CAPT's competition here
CRH vs STAI Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while STAI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STAI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check STAI's competition here
CRH vs RETO Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while RETO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check RETO's competition here
CRH vs USCR Comparison August 2025
CRH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRH stands at 76.2B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRH is priced at $113.33, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRH currently has a P/E ratio of 23.75, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CRH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRH is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRH.Check USCR's competition here