Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRESY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | $11.36 | +1.34% | 690.3M | 16.00 | $0.71 | +10.39% |
| HON | $224.24 | -0.11% | 144.1B | 25.48 | $8.80 | +2.00% |
| MMM | $151.27 | +1.32% | 80.6B | 21.01 | $7.20 | +1.90% |
| VMI | $361.43 | +1.13% | 7.3B | 33.49 | $10.79 | +0.71% |
| IEP | $9.36 | -0.11% | 5.1B | -5.71 | -$1.64 | +26.57% |
| GFF | $82.65 | +1.37% | 3.9B | 17.11 | $4.83 | +0.84% |
| MDU | $17.02 | +0.92% | 3.5B | 18.71 | $0.91 | +2.72% |
| SEB | $3,128.11 | +0.63% | 3.1B | 31.15 | $100.98 | +0.29% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $25.67 | +1.26% | 2.3B | -73.34 | -$0.35 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
CRESY vs HON Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while HON trades at $224.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check HON's competition here
CRESY vs MMM Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while MMM trades at $151.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check MMM's competition here
CRESY vs VMI Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while VMI trades at $361.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check VMI's competition here
CRESY vs IEP Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while IEP trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check IEP's competition here
CRESY vs GFF Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while GFF trades at $82.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check GFF's competition here
CRESY vs MDU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while MDU trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check MDU's competition here
CRESY vs SEB Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while SEB trades at $3,128.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check SEB's competition here
CRESY vs VRTV Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check VRTV's competition here
CRESY vs BBU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while BBU trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -73.34. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check BBU's competition here
CRESY vs CODI-PC Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while CODI-PC trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check CODI-PC's competition here
CRESY vs FBYDW Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 906.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while FBYDW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check FBYDW's competition here
CRESY vs SPLP Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 775.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while SPLP trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check SPLP's competition here
CRESY vs MATW Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while MATW trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check MATW's competition here
CRESY vs FIP Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 755.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while FIP trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check FIP's competition here
CRESY vs CRESW Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 551.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while CRESW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check CRESW's competition here
CRESY vs CODI-PB Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 519.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while CODI-PB trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check CODI-PB's competition here
CRESY vs CODI Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while CODI trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY and CODI have similar daily volatility (3.42).Check CODI's competition here
CRESY vs TRC Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while TRC trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 237.56. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check TRC's competition here
CRESY vs CODI-PA Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while CODI-PA trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check CODI-PA's competition here
CRESY vs SPLP-PA Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
CRESY vs FIPWV Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check FIPWV's competition here
CRESY vs FBYD Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while FBYD trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 715.00. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check FBYD's competition here
CRESY vs RCMT Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while RCMT trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check RCMT's competition here
CRESY vs TUSK Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while TUSK trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check TUSK's competition here
CRESY vs IRS Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while IRS trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check IRS's competition here
CRESY vs NNBR Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while NNBR trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check NNBR's competition here
CRESY vs IGC Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while IGC trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check IGC's competition here
CRESY vs EFSH Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check EFSH's competition here
CRESY vs DOTAU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check DOTAU's competition here
CRESY vs JBK Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while JBK trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check JBK's competition here
CRESY vs FNTEU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check FNTEU's competition here
CRESY vs OBCI Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check OBCI's competition here
CRESY vs ELECU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check ELECU's competition here
CRESY vs STLRU Comparison July 2025
CRESY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESY stands at 690.3M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESY is priced at $11.36, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESY is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESY.Check STLRU's competition here