Cresud SACIF y A
Cresud SACIF y A CRESW Peers
See (CRESW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESW | $0.91 | +6.15% | 560.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HON | $228.78 | +0.93% | 147B | 26.30 | $8.70 | +1.95% |
| MMM | $145.48 | -0.53% | 78.3B | 18.12 | $8.03 | +1.96% |
| VMI | $325.67 | +1.08% | 6.5B | 18.92 | $17.21 | +0.76% |
| IEP | $8.42 | -0.41% | 4.6B | -5.13 | -$1.64 | +29.74% |
| MDU | $16.81 | +0.09% | 3.4B | 18.47 | $0.91 | +2.71% |
| GFF | $70.37 | +0.25% | 3.3B | 14.57 | $4.83 | +0.98% |
| SEB | $2,765.70 | -0.09% | 2.7B | 27.38 | $101.00 | +0.32% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $25.30 | +0.28% | 2.3B | -72.29 | -$0.35 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
CRESW vs HON Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while HON trades at $228.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MMM Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while MMM trades at $145.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs VMI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while VMI trades at $325.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IEP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while IEP trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MDU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while MDU trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs GFF Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while GFF trades at $70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SEB Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while SEB trades at $2,765.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs VRTV Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs BBU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while BBU trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -72.29. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PC trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SPLP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 758.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while SPLP trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FIP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 739.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while FIP trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MATW Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 685.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while MATW trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CRESY Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 681.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while CRESY trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PA Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 583.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PA trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PB Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while CODI-PB trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 538.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while CODI trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs TRC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 432.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while TRC trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 201.25. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SPLP-PA Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FIPWV Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FBYD Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while FBYD trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs RCMT Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while RCMT trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs TUSK Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while TUSK trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IRS Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while IRS trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IRS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs NNBR Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while NNBR trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IGC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while IGC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FBYDW Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while FBYDW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs EFSH Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs OBCI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs STLRU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs JBK Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while JBK trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FNTEU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs ELECU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 560.6M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.91, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.