Cresud SACIF y A
Cresud SACIF y A CRESW Peers
See (CRESW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESW | $0.84 | -1.18% | 515.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HON | $232.88 | +1.76% | 149.7B | 26.80 | $8.69 | +1.92% |
| MMM | $152.24 | +0.14% | 81.9B | 18.92 | $8.04 | +1.88% |
| VMI | $326.57 | -2.18% | 6.5B | 19.00 | $17.17 | +0.78% |
| IEP | $8.05 | -1.71% | 4.4B | -4.91 | -$1.64 | +30.87% |
| MDU | $16.67 | +0.66% | 3.4B | 18.31 | $0.91 | +2.79% |
| GFF | $72.37 | -0.39% | 3.4B | 14.98 | $4.83 | +0.96% |
| SEB | $2,861.20 | +0.63% | 2.8B | 28.35 | $100.94 | +0.31% |
| BBU | $25.93 | +2.14% | 2.3B | -74.09 | -$0.35 | +0.97% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRESW vs HON Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 149.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while HON trades at $232.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MMM Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while MMM trades at $152.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs VMI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while VMI trades at $326.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IEP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while IEP trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MDU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while MDU trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs GFF Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while GFF trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SEB Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while SEB trades at $2,861.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs BBU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while BBU trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -74.09. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs VRTV Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while CODI-PC trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SPLP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 785M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while SPLP trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs MATW Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while MATW trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.38. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FIP Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 708.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while FIP trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CRESY Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 653.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while CRESY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FBYDW Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 568.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while FBYDW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PA Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while CODI-PA trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI-PB Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while CODI-PB trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs CODI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 471.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while CODI trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs TRC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 455.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while TRC trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 211.75. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs SPLP-PA Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FIPWV Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FBYD Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while FBYD trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 599.00. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs RCMT Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while RCMT trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs TUSK Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while TUSK trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs NNBR Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while NNBR trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IRS Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while IRS trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs IGC Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while IGC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs EFSH Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs DOTAU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs JBK Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while JBK trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs ELECU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs FNTEU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs OBCI Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.
CRESW vs STLRU Comparison
CRESW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRESW stands at 515.8M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRESW is priced at $0.84, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRESW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRESW's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRESW is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRESW.