Cosmic CRF Limited
Cosmic CRF Limited (COSMICCRF.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COSMICCRF.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSMICCRF.BO | ₹1,084.40 | +10.24% | 9.5B | 22.62 | ₹45.66 | N/A |
| JSWSTEEL.BO | ₹1,309.55 | +1.65% | 3.2T | 14.19 | ₹91.20 | +0.22% |
| JSWSTEEL.NS | ₹1,309.30 | +1.54% | 3.2T | 14.17 | ₹91.27 | +0.22% |
| TATASTEEL.NS | ₹214.70 | +2.13% | 2.6T | 28.60 | ₹7.36 | +1.71% |
| TATASTEEL.BO | ₹214.75 | +2.16% | 2.6T | 38.61 | ₹5.45 | +1.71% |
| JINDALSTEL.BO | ₹1,219.95 | +0.56% | 1.2T | 36.88 | ₹33.17 | +0.16% |
| JINDALSTEL.NS | ₹1,220.60 | +0.68% | 1.2T | 36.89 | ₹33.15 | +0.16% |
| LLOYDSME.BO | ₹1,858.30 | +3.22% | 1T | 27.76 | ₹66.80 | +0.05% |
| LLOYDSME.NS | ₹1,858.80 | +3.19% | 1T | 27.71 | ₹66.89 | +0.05% |
| SAIL.NS | ₹206.06 | +3.90% | 842B | 24.95 | ₹8.17 | +0.78% |
Stock Comparison
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSWSTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,309.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSWSTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,309.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TATASTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹214.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TATASTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JINDALSTEL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,219.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JINDALSTEL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,220.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs LLOYDSME.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,858.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs LLOYDSME.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,858.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SAIL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 842B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹206.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SAIL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 841.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹206.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SAIL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs NMDC.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 797.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹92.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check NMDC.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs NMDC.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NMDC.NS has a market cap of 797.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while NMDC.NS trades at ₹92.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas NMDC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMDC.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to NMDC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check NMDC.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 599.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSL.BO trades at ₹725.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 599.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSL.NS trades at ₹722.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs APLAPOLLO.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 520.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹1,868.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs APLAPOLLO.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 520.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹1,867.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs WELCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 347.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹1,372.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs WELCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 347.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹1,371.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SHYAMMETL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 273.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹976.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SHYAMMETL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 272B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹974.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs KIOCL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 241.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹415.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -322.97. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs KIOCL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KIOCL.NS has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while KIOCL.NS trades at ₹416.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas KIOCL.NS's P/E ratio is -322.85. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KIOCL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to KIOCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check KIOCL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SARDAEN.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 187.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹521.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SARDAEN.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹521.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹281.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GPIL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 185.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹281.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GPIL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RATNAMANI.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,587.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RATNAMANI.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,590.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GALLANTT.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹688.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GALLANTT.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹689.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs USHAMART.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹510.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs USHAMART.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹510.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JINDALSAW.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹246.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JINDALSAW.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹245.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSLHISAR.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs NSLNISP.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹46.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs NSLNISP.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹46.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is -16.38. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JAYNECOIND.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹104.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JAYNECOIND.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹104.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAHSEAMLES.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹635.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAHSEAMLES.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹635.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs IMFA.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,472.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check IMFA.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs IMFA.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,472.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check IMFA.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MIDHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹416.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 70.78. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MIDHANI.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹416.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 70.03. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SUNFLAG.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹391.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SUNFLAG.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JAIBALAJI.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹72.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JAIBALAJI.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹72.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs BANSALWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹328.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs ELECTCAST.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹81.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs ELECTCAST.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹81.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SURYAROSNI.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹237.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SURYAROSNI.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹237.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TINPLATE.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TINPLATE.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GOODLUCK.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.NS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GOODLUCK.NS trades at ₹1,381.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GOODLUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODLUCK.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GOODLUCK.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs GOODLUCK.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,378.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MANINDS.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹529.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MANINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹528.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SANDUMA.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹240.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SANDUMA.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹240.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TATASTLLP.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs KSL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while KSL.NS trades at ₹858.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check KSL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs KSL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while KSL.BO trades at ₹856.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check KSL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs ISMTLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs ISMTLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TATAMETALI.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs TATAMETALI.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹6,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 152.58. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs SAMBHV.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹106.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs VENUSPIPES.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,450.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs VENUSPIPES.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,448.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs STEELCAS.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹286.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs WELSPLSOL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JTLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹70.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JTLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹70.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAITHANALL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹1,013.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAITHANALL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹1,011.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs PRAKASH.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹152.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs PRAKASH.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹152.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs VSSL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹274.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check VSSL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs VSSL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹275.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check VSSL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MSPL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is -25.54. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MSPL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MSPL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.49. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MSPL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RHETAN.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 230.69. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RHETAN.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 230.46. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RAJRATAN.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs RAJRATAN.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹420.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MUKANDLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MUKANDLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹139.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs HITECH.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹95.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check HITECH.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs HITECH.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check HITECH.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs JSWISPL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs BHARATWIRE.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while BHARATWIRE.BO trades at ₹231.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas BHARATWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check BHARATWIRE.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs BHARATWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while BHARATWIRE.NS trades at ₹231.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas BHARATWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check BHARATWIRE.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAHASTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAHASTEEL.NS trades at ₹932.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAHASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 137.25. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAHASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAHASTEEL.NS's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs MAHASTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹934.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 135.64. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here
COSMICCRF.BO vs STEELXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
COSMICCRF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COSMICCRF.BO stands at 9.5B. In comparison, STEELXIND.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COSMICCRF.BO is priced at ₹1,084.40, while STEELXIND.NS trades at ₹11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COSMICCRF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.62, whereas STEELXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 67.75. In terms of profitability, COSMICCRF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STEELXIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COSMICCRF.BO is less volatile compared to STEELXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COSMICCRF.BO.Check STEELXIND.NS's competition here