NMDC Limited
NMDC Limited (NMDC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NMDC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMDC.NS | ₹90.14 | +1.47% | 784.1B | 11.36 | ₹7.85 | +3.92% |
| JSWSTEEL.NS | ₹1,283.40 | +2.48% | 3.1T | 41.79 | ₹30.47 | +0.22% |
| JSWSTEEL.BO | ₹1,283.30 | +2.45% | 3.1T | 41.79 | ₹30.47 | +0.22% |
| TATASTEEL.BO | ₹217.05 | +2.72% | 2.7T | 39.55 | ₹5.45 | +1.67% |
| TATASTEEL.NS | ₹217.09 | +2.73% | 2.7T | 29.28 | ₹7.36 | +1.67% |
| JINDALSTEL.BO | ₹1,258.55 | -0.12% | 1.3T | 64.97 | ₹19.46 | +0.16% |
| JINDALSTEL.NS | ₹1,258.20 | -0.24% | 1.3T | 65.00 | ₹19.45 | +0.16% |
| LLOYDSME.BO | ₹1,724.95 | -3.24% | 961.6B | 26.39 | ₹66.85 | +0.06% |
| LLOYDSME.NS | ₹1,726.70 | -3.20% | 961.6B | 26.38 | ₹66.89 | +0.06% |
| NMDC.BO | ₹90.20 | +1.55% | 784.2B | 11.36 | ₹7.85 | +3.92% |
Stock Comparison
NMDC.NS vs JSWSTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,283.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.79. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JSWSTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,283.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.79. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TATASTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹217.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TATASTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹217.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JINDALSTEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,258.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.97. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JINDALSTEL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,258.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs LLOYDSME.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 961.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,724.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs LLOYDSME.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 961.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,726.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs NMDC.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 784.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹90.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check NMDC.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SAIL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 768.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹187.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SAIL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 768.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹187.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SAIL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JSL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 631.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSL.NS trades at ₹766.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JSL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 630B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSL.BO trades at ₹766.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs APLAPOLLO.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 531.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹1,972.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs APLAPOLLO.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 531.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹1,973.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.32. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs WELCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 338.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹1,299.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs WELCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 338.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹1,299.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SHYAMMETL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 249.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹884.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs KIOCL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 249B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹409.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -335.78. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SHYAMMETL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 249B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹882.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs KIOCL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, KIOCL.NS has a market cap of 248.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while KIOCL.NS trades at ₹408.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KIOCL.NS's P/E ratio is -335.33. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIOCL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to KIOCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check KIOCL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SARDAEN.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 207.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹593.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SARDAEN.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹593.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GALLANTT.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹867.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GALLANTT.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹866.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GPIL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 198.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹304.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GPIL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹304.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GPIL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RATNAMANI.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,827.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RATNAMANI.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 191.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JINDALSAW.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹242.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JINDALSAW.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 154.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹242.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs USHAMART.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹477.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs USHAMART.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹477.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JSLHISAR.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs NSLNISP.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs NSLNISP.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹44.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JAYNECOIND.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹114.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JAYNECOIND.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹115.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs LLOYDSENT.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.NS has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while LLOYDSENT.NS trades at ₹69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas LLOYDSENT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LLOYDSENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check LLOYDSENT.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹652.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹654.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs IMFA.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,466.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check IMFA.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs IMFA.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,467.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check IMFA.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JAIBALAJI.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JAIBALAJI.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹84.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MIDHANI.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹413.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 67.86. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MIDHANI.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹413.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.16. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SUNFLAG.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹411.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SUNFLAG.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹412.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SURYAROSNI.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹269.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SURYAROSNI.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹270.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs ELECTCAST.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹91.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs ELECTCAST.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs BANSALWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹326.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GOODLUCK.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,390.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs GOODLUCK.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while GOODLUCK.NS trades at ₹1,405.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GOODLUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOODLUCK.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check GOODLUCK.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TINPLATE.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TINPLATE.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MANINDS.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹535.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MANINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹534.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs KSL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while KSL.BO trades at ₹895.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check KSL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs KSL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while KSL.NS trades at ₹894.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check KSL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TATASTLLP.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs ISMTLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs ISMTLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SAMBHV.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 43.34. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TATAMETALI.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs TATAMETALI.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SANDUMA.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹216.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs SANDUMA.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹216.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JTLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹82.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JTLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹82.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs STEELCAS.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹293.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs VENUSPIPES.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAITHANALL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹1,023.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAITHANALL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹1,022.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs VENUSPIPES.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,419.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs WELSPLSOL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 118.00. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs PRAKASH.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹153.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs PRAKASH.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹153.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs VSSL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹276.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check VSSL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs VSSL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹277.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check VSSL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹5,569.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 247.79. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RAJRATAN.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹451.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RAJRATAN.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹451.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MSPL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹40.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is -22.92. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MSPL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MSPL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹40.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -24.65. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MSPL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RHETAN.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 326.63. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs RHETAN.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 326.50. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MUKANDLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹139.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MUKANDLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹139.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs HITECH.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹91.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check HITECH.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs HITECH.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹91.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check HITECH.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs JSWISPL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs BHARATWIRE.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while BHARATWIRE.BO trades at ₹236.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BHARATWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs BHARATWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while BHARATWIRE.NS trades at ₹237.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BHARATWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAHASTEEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹827.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 123.68. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here
NMDC.NS vs MAHASTEEL.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while MAHASTEEL.NS trades at ₹837.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MAHASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 123.87. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAHASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.NS's competition here
NMDC.NS vs STEELXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
NMDC.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMDC.NS stands at 784.1B. In comparison, STEELXIND.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMDC.NS is priced at ₹90.14, while STEELXIND.NS trades at ₹10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMDC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas STEELXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 67.13. In terms of profitability, NMDC.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STEELXIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMDC.NS is less volatile compared to STEELXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMDC.NS.Check STEELXIND.NS's competition here