Goodluck India Limited

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,252.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,252.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹211.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹211.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,261.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 64.85. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,260.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.79. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 979.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,782.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 979.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,783.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NMDC.NS has a market cap of 783.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while NMDC.NS trades at ₹88.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas NMDC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMDC.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NMDC.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 783B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹88.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NMDC.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 768.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹187.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAIL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 768.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹187.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAIL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 641.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSL.BO trades at ₹779.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 641.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSL.NS trades at ₹779.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 520.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹1,870.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 520.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹1,870.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 327.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹1,254.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 326.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹1,254.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 252.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹891.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 252B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹890.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, KIOCL.NS has a market cap of 250B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while KIOCL.NS trades at ₹411.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas KIOCL.NS's P/E ratio is -337.13. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIOCL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to KIOCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KIOCL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹410.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -336.80. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 210.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹877.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.15. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹877.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 208.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹585.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 208B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹585.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 198.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹304.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GPIL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 198.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹304.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GPIL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,742.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,742.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹232.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹232.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹454.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹453.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹42.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹112.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹112.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.NS has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while LLOYDSENT.NS trades at ₹67.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas LLOYDSENT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSENT.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹634.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹634.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,422.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check IMFA.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,421.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check IMFA.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹82.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹82.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹396.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 67.44. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹396.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.32. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹275.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹275.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹350.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹351.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹93.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹93.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹299.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,374.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹534.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹533.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while KSL.NS trades at ₹895.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KSL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while KSL.BO trades at ₹893.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KSL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹121.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹207.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹207.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹78.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹78.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹993.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹993.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,370.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,374.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹40.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 122.51. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹283.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹278.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VSSL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹277.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VSSL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹148.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹149.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹5,205.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 242.97. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹445.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹446.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹36.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -24.03. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MSPL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is -22.31. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MSPL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹137.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹137.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 305.50. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 304.38. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹90.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check HITECH.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹90.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check HITECH.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while BHARATWIRE.NS trades at ₹242.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas BHARATWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while BHARATWIRE.BO trades at ₹243.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas BHARATWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹865.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 126.97. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while MAHASTEEL.NS trades at ₹863.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas MAHASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 126.87. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.NS's competition here

GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SALASAR.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,374.50, while SALASAR.BO trades at ₹7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.47, whereas SALASAR.BO's P/E ratio is 75.50. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALASAR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SALASAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SALASAR.BO's competition here