KIOCL Limited (KIOCL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIOCL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIOCL.NS | ₹398.65 | +3.17% | 242.3B | 1374.66 | ₹0.29 | N/A |
| JSWSTEEL.NS | ₹1,297.60 | +1.19% | 3.2T | 14.21 | ₹91.30 | +0.22% |
| JSWSTEEL.BO | ₹1,297.55 | +1.17% | 3.2T | 14.22 | ₹91.27 | +0.22% |
| TATASTEEL.NS | ₹197.86 | -0.05% | 2.5T | 22.87 | ₹8.65 | +2.02% |
| TATASTEEL.BO | ₹197.85 | -0.08% | 2.5T | 36.30 | ₹5.45 | +2.02% |
| JINDALSTEL.BO | ₹1,148.50 | +2.37% | 1.2T | 34.70 | ₹33.10 | +0.17% |
| JINDALSTEL.NS | ₹1,148.50 | +2.43% | 1.2T | 34.72 | ₹33.08 | +0.17% |
| LLOYDSME.NS | ₹1,761.90 | +5.24% | 960.1B | 26.38 | ₹66.80 | +0.06% |
| LLOYDSME.BO | ₹1,760.20 | +5.14% | 960.1B | 26.35 | ₹66.80 | +0.06% |
| NMDC.BO | ₹90.89 | +2.78% | 800.3B | 10.73 | ₹8.47 | +3.85% |
Stock Comparison
KIOCL.NS vs JSWSTEEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,297.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JSWSTEEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,297.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TATASTEEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹197.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TATASTEEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹197.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JINDALSTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JINDALSTEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs LLOYDSME.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 960.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,761.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs LLOYDSME.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 960.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs NMDC.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 800.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹90.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check NMDC.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs NMDC.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, NMDC.NS has a market cap of 799.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while NMDC.NS trades at ₹90.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas NMDC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMDC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check NMDC.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 760.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹184.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SAIL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 760.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SAIL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JSL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 573.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSL.BO trades at ₹695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JSL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 572.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSL.NS trades at ₹694.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs APLAPOLLO.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 504.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹1,818.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.91. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs APLAPOLLO.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 504.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹1,817.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs WELCORP.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 361.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹1,402.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs WELCORP.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 361B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹1,398.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SHYAMMETL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 274.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹983.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SHYAMMETL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 272.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs KIOCL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 243B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹399.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is 1376.21. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SARDAEN.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹519.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SARDAEN.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹520.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RATNAMANI.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 181.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,581.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RATNAMANI.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,580.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹277.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GPIL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 180.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹277.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GPIL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GALLANTT.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹654.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GALLANTT.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹653.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JINDALSAW.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JINDALSAW.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹238.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs USHAMART.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹486.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs USHAMART.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹486.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs NSLNISP.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is 236.20. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs NSLNISP.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹47.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is 236.15. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JSLHISAR.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JAYNECOIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹90.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JAYNECOIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹90.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹617.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹617.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MIDHANI.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹435.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MIDHANI.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹435.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 64.35. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs IMFA.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,398.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check IMFA.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs IMFA.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,398.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check IMFA.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SUNFLAG.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹353.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SUNFLAG.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹352.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JAIBALAJI.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JAIBALAJI.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SURYAROSNI.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹263.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SURYAROSNI.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹263.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹10,029.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 237.60. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs BANSALWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹303.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TINPLATE.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TINPLATE.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ELECTCAST.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹71.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ELECTCAST.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GOODLUCK.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,316.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs GOODLUCK.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.NS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while GOODLUCK.NS trades at ₹1,313.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas GOODLUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOODLUCK.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check GOODLUCK.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MANINDS.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹546.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MANINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹545.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TATASTLLP.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs WELSPLSOL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹51.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ISMTLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ISMTLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs KSL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while KSL.NS trades at ₹807.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check KSL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TATAMETALI.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs TATAMETALI.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs KSL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while KSL.BO trades at ₹804.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check KSL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SANDUMA.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹215.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SANDUMA.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹215.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs SAMBHV.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹108.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MAITHANALL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹1,014.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MAITHANALL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹1,014.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JTLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹74.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JTLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs VENUSPIPES.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,411.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs VENUSPIPES.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,414.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs STEELCAS.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹285.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs VSSL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹276.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check VSSL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs VSSL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹275.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check VSSL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs PRAKASH.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹141.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs PRAKASH.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹141.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RHETAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 230.46. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RHETAN.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 230.15. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MSPL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹41.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -26.73. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MSPL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MSPL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is 74.05. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MSPL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RAJRATAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹459.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs RAJRATAN.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹459.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MUKANDLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹134.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MUKANDLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs JSWISPL.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is more volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs HITECH.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹89.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check HITECH.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs HITECH.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹89.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check HITECH.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹1,190.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is -96.76. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs ELECTHERM.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, ELECTHERM.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while ELECTHERM.BO trades at ₹1,187.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas ELECTHERM.BO's P/E ratio is -96.85. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELECTHERM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTHERM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check ELECTHERM.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs MAHASTEEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹884.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 152.41. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs STEELXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, STEELXIND.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while STEELXIND.BO trades at ₹11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas STEELXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STEELXIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to STEELXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check STEELXIND.BO's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs BHARATWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while BHARATWIRE.NS trades at ₹208.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas BHARATWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHARATWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.NS's competition here
KIOCL.NS vs BHARATWIRE.BO Comparison June 2026
KIOCL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIOCL.NS stands at 242.3B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIOCL.NS is priced at ₹398.65, while BHARATWIRE.BO trades at ₹209.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIOCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1374.66, whereas BHARATWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, KIOCL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHARATWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIOCL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIOCL.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.BO's competition here