Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. CNSL Peers
See (CNSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSL | $4.64 | -0.22% | 549.7M | -2.27 | -$2.04 | N/A |
| TMUS | $230.90 | +0.47% | 262.2B | 22.57 | $10.23 | +1.43% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $27.94 | -1.18% | 201B | 17.14 | $1.63 | +3.98% |
| TBB | $22.45 | -0.34% | 199B | 4.38 | $5.12 | +5.95% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $42.15 | -1.14% | 177.7B | 10.03 | $4.20 | +6.41% |
| T-PA | $19.93 | -0.22% | 143.4B | 8.38 | $2.38 | +3.98% |
| T-PC | $19.00 | -0.13% | 136.7B | 7.99 | $2.38 | +3.98% |
| CMCSA | $34.85 | -1.04% | 129.8B | 8.58 | $4.06 | +3.61% |
Stock Comparison
CNSL vs TMUS Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 262.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TMUS trades at $230.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs VZA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs T Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 201B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while T trades at $27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TBB Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TBB trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TBC Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs VZ Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 177.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while VZ trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs T-PA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while T-PA trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs T-PC Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while T-PC trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CMCSA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CMCSA trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs AMOV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CHTR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CHTR trades at $398.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs AMX Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while AMX trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CHT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CHT trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ORAN Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TEF Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TEF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -51.65. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs VOD Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while VOD trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TU Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TU trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs BCE Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while BCE trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 70.77. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs VIV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while VIV trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs RCI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while RCI trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TLK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TLK trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs SJR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBRDK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBRDK trades at $94.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBRDA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBRDA trades at $93.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBRDP Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBRDP trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs KT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while KT trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs MBT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs FYBR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while FYBR trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.29. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TIMB Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TIMB trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs SKM Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while SKM trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CTDD Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CTDD trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TIGO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TIGO trades at $36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs USM Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while USM trades at $62.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -135.43. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs UZD Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while UZD trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TKC Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TKC trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs UZE Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while UZE trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL and UZE have similar daily volatility (0.43).
CNSL vs UZF Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while UZF trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs PHI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while PHI trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LUMN Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LUMN trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBYKV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CTBB Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CTBB trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TDS Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TDS trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.42. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs SNRE Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while SNRE trades at $53.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TDS-PU Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TDS-PU trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TDS-PV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TDS-PV trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBTYA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBTYA trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBTYB Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBTYB trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBTYK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBTYK trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs IRDM Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while IRDM trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs DISH Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs GSAT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while GSAT trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -37.42. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs VEON Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while VEON trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TEO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TEO trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 87.70. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CCOI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CCOI trades at $48.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs GOGO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while GOGO trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -362.00. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs IHS Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while IHS trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -43.60. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ASTSW Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs IDT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while IDT trades at $66.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs RADI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LILAK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LILAK trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LILA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LILA trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ATUS Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 979.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ATUS trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs SHEN Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 765.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while SHEN trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CABO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 739.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CABO trades at $131.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs RBBN Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 715M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while RBBN trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ATEX Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ATEX trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -43.93. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs WOW Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 349.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while WOW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs OOMA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 341.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while OOMA trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -65.16. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs HCHC Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TV trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ATNI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ATNI trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs RDCM Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while RDCM trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CXDO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CXDO trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 71.88. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs FNGR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while FNGR trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs MTSL Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs SIFY Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while SIFY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TDI Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TDI trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs KORE Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while KORE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs PCLA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while PCLA trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs IQST Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while IQST trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ANTE Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ANTE trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs MIMO Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs UCL Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while UCL trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs QTEK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs QTEKW Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs COMSP Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs COMSW Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs MIMO-WT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LORL Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs OIBR-C Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs LBYAV Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs CBB Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TIGOR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs PTNR Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs GTT Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs UZA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs TDA Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs ALSK Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is less volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.
CNSL vs STRY Comparison
CNSL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNSL stands at 549.7M. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNSL is priced at $4.64, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.27, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNSL's ROE is -0.31%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CNSL is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNSL.