Cumulus Media Inc.
Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CMLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMLS | $0.13 | +0.00% | 2.1M | -0.01 | -$17.82 | N/A |
| CCZ | $59.75 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 50.98 | $1.17 | +3.79% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $17.04 | -0.06% | 2.7B | 6.02 | $2.83 | +2.94% |
| FUBO | $3.68 | +2.22% | 1.3B | 18.33 | $0.20 | N/A |
| NMAX | $13.92 | -0.50% | 1.2B | -37.65 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $10.75 | +1.42% | 583.7M | 4.59 | $2.34 | +6.41% |
| GTN | $4.97 | -3.31% | 457.8M | 2.12 | $2.34 | +6.41% |
Stock Comparison
CMLS vs CCZ Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while CCZ trades at $59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 50.98. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS and CCZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCZ's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMK Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMK's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMA Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMA's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMB Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMB's competition here
CMLS vs TGNA Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while TGNA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check TGNA's competition here
CMLS vs FUBO Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while FUBO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check FUBO's competition here
CMLS vs NMAX Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while NMAX trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -37.65. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check NMAX's competition here
CMLS vs GTN-A Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while GTN-A trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check GTN-A's competition here
CMLS vs GTN Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 457.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while GTN trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check GTN's competition here
CMLS vs SSP Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while SSP trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SSP's competition here
CMLS vs CURI Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while CURI trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -34.07. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check CURI's competition here
CMLS vs IHRT Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while IHRT trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check IHRT's competition here
CMLS vs EVC Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 217M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while EVC trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check EVC's competition here
CMLS vs SGA Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while SGA trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SGA's competition here
CMLS vs MDIA Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while MDIA trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check MDIA's competition here
CMLS vs UONEK Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while UONEK trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check UONEK's competition here
CMLS vs UONE Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while UONE trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check UONE's competition here
CMLS vs SJ Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while SJ trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SJ's competition here
CMLS vs SALM Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while SALM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SALM's competition here
CMLS vs AUD Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check AUD's competition here
CMLS vs XHLD Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while XHLD trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -10.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check XHLD's competition here
CMLS vs BBGI Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while BBGI trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check BBGI's competition here
CMLS vs CURIW Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while CURIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check CURIW's competition here
CMLS vs QVCC Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while QVCC trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check QVCC's competition here
CMLS vs DISCA Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check DISCA's competition here
CMLS vs QVCD Comparison July 2025
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 2.1M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.13, while QVCD trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is -2.59%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check QVCD's competition here