Commercial Metals Company
Commercial Metals Company CMC Peers
See (CMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMC | $48.45 | +5.12% | 5.47B | 80.75 | $0.60 | +1.48% |
| NUE | $120.12 | +4.25% | 27.72B | 21.19 | $5.67 | +1.81% |
| MT | $31.20 | +3.07% | 23.90B | 19.87 | $1.57 | +1.60% |
| STLD | $136.53 | +4.61% | 20.47B | 17.94 | $7.61 | +1.37% |
| RS | $304.31 | +2.70% | 16.00B | 21.64 | $14.06 | +1.48% |
| PKX | $46.97 | +1.29% | 14.21B | 25.95 | $1.81 | +2.27% |
| X | $42.02 | -0.97% | 9.51B | 113.57 | $0.37 | +0.48% |
| GGB | $2.68 | +2.10% | 5.55B | 9.55 | $0.28 | +5.98% |
| SIM | $26.40 | +3.53% | 4.06B | 7.83 | $3.37 | N/A |
| CLF | $7.50 | +7.14% | 3.71B | -4.78 | -$1.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CMC vs NUE Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 27.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while NUE trades at $120.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs MT Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 23.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while MT trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs STLD Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 20.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while STLD trades at $136.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs RS Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while RS trades at $304.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs PKX Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while PKX trades at $46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs X Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while X trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas X's P/E ratio is 113.57. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs GGB Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while GGB trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs SIM Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while SIM trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs CLF Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while CLF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs SID Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while SID trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs WS Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while WS trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs SCHN Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs TMST Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs RDUS Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 822.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while RDUS trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs ASTL Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 656.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while ASTL trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs TX Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 564.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while TX trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs MTUS Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 538.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while MTUS trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 427.50. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs USAP Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs ZEUS Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 366.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while ZEUS trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs MSB Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 333.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while MSB trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs SYNL Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs ACNT Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 128.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while ACNT trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs HLP Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 114.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while HLP trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs FRD Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 112.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while FRD trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs LUD Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 91.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while LUD trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -202.50. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs ASTLW Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 47.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while ASTLW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs HUDI Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 19.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while HUDI trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs ZKIN Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 14.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while ZKIN trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs KBSX Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 13.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while KBSX trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -65.67. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.
CMC vs INHD Comparison
CMC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMC stands at 5.47B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 10.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CMC is priced at $48.45, while INHD trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMC currently has a P/E ratio of 80.75, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, CMC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CMC is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMC.