The Clorox Company

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 363.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while PG trades at $155.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check PG's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while UL trades at $61.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check UL's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while CL trades at $84.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to CL's ROE of +6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check CL's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while KMB trades at $133.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check KMB's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while KVUE trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check KVUE's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while EL trades at $91.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -37.90. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check EL's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while CHD trades at $92.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check CHD's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while SGI trades at $78.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check SGI's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while HIMS trades at $47.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 60.65. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check HIMS's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while ELF trades at $116.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 69.11. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check ELF's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check NTCO's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while COTY trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check COTY's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while IPAR trades at $116.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check IPAR's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while NWL trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check NWL's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while SPB trades at $57.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check SPB's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while EPC trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check EPC's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 551.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while NUS trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check NUS's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 532.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while HELE trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check HELE's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while SKIN trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check SKIN's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while SLSN trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check SLSN's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while EWCZ trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check EWCZ's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while ACU trades at $43.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check ACU's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while RAY trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check RAY's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while DSY trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check DSY's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while GROV trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check GROV's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while UG trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check UG's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while MTEX trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -79.18. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check MTEX's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while PHH trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check PHH's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check BRSH's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while TANH trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check TANH's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while TKLF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check TKLF's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check BRSHW's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while SUMR trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check SUMR's competition here

CLX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLX stands at 15.1B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLX is priced at $122.82, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.84, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CLX's ROE is +8.83%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLX is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLX.Check REV's competition here