Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF Peers
See (CLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLF | $7.63 | +2.35% | 3.7B | -3.06 | -$2.43 | N/A |
| NUE | $131.53 | +0.70% | 30.3B | 23.19 | $5.67 | +1.66% |
| MT | $31.55 | -0.30% | 23.8B | 19.91 | $1.57 | +1.55% |
| STLD | $130.11 | -1.06% | 19.5B | 17.24 | $7.61 | +1.43% |
| RS | $316.71 | +0.65% | 16.7B | 22.54 | $14.06 | +1.45% |
| PKX | $48.50 | -2.64% | 14.4B | 23.73 | $2.01 | +2.21% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $30.62 | -0.92% | 6B | -17.07 | -$1.80 | +8.86% |
| GGB | $2.92 | +1.04% | 5.7B | 9.93 | $0.29 | +3.70% |
| CMC | $49.80 | -0.58% | 5.7B | 166.77 | $0.30 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
CLF vs NUE Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while NUE trades at $131.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while MT trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs STLD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while STLD trades at $130.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while RS trades at $316.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs PKX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while PKX trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs X Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while TX trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs GGB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while GGB trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs CMC Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while CMC trades at $49.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 166.77. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SID Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while SID trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs WS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while WS trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SIM Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while SIM trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SCHN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TMST Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RDUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 830M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while RDUS trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 699.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while ASTL trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 653.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while MTUS trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -31.76. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs USAP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZEUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while ZEUS trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MSB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while MSB trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SYNL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ACNT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while ACNT trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs LUD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while LUD trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -276.50. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs FRD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while FRD trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs KBSX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while KBSX trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HLP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while HLP trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTLW Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while ASTLW trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HUDI Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while HUDI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZKIN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while ZKIN trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs INHD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while INHD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs OSN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL-P Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.63, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.06, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.