Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF Peers
See (CLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLF | $7.61 | +7.11% | 3.8B | -3.13 | -$2.43 | N/A |
| NUE | $121.57 | +2.37% | 28.1B | 21.44 | $5.67 | +1.79% |
| MT | $30.11 | -1.46% | 22.9B | 19.18 | $1.57 | +1.60% |
| STLD | $133.56 | +1.11% | 19.8B | 17.55 | $7.61 | +1.41% |
| RS | $309.67 | +0.85% | 16.3B | 22.04 | $14.05 | +1.48% |
| PKX | $47.71 | +0.06% | 14.4B | 23.86 | $2.00 | +2.22% |
| X | $53.40 | +0.82% | 12.1B | 144.31 | $0.37 | +0.38% |
| GGB | $2.97 | +0.17% | 5.9B | 10.59 | $0.28 | +3.59% |
| TX | $28.91 | +1.37% | 5.7B | -16.06 | -$1.80 | +9.32% |
| CMC | $49.95 | +2.08% | 5.6B | 83.25 | $0.60 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
CLF vs NUE Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while NUE trades at $121.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while MT trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs STLD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while STLD trades at $133.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while RS trades at $309.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs PKX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while PKX trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs X Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while X trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas X's P/E ratio is 144.31. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs GGB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while GGB trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while TX trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -16.06. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs CMC Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while CMC trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 83.25. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SID Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while SID trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SIM Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while SIM trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs WS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while WS trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SCHN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs TMST Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs RDUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while RDUS trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while ASTL trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 591.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while MTUS trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs USAP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZEUS Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while ZEUS trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MSB Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while MSB trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs SYNL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ACNT Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while ACNT trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs FRD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while FRD trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs LUD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while LUD trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -217.50. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs KBSX Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while KBSX trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HLP Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while HLP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ASTLW Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while ASTLW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs HUDI Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while HUDI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs ZKIN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while ZKIN trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs INHD Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while INHD trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs OSN Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.
CLF vs MTL-P Comparison
CLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLF stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLF is priced at $7.61, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.13, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLF's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLF is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLF.