Colgate-Palmolive Company
Colgate-Palmolive Company CL Peers
See (CL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | $90.60 | -1.45% | 73.4B | 25.67 | $3.53 | +2.23% |
| PG | $166.86 | -0.55% | 391.2B | 26.49 | $6.30 | +2.44% |
| UL | $62.71 | -1.10% | 156.6B | 24.12 | $2.60 | +3.08% |
| KMB | $139.49 | -1.55% | 46.3B | 19.00 | $7.34 | +3.52% |
| KVUE | $22.22 | -6.15% | 42.7B | 39.68 | $0.56 | +3.68% |
| EL | $68.90 | +3.38% | 24.8B | -28.47 | -$2.42 | +2.49% |
| CHD | $99.58 | +0.55% | 24.5B | 42.74 | $2.33 | +1.16% |
| CLX | $130.12 | -0.13% | 16B | 23.36 | $5.57 | +3.74% |
| SGI | $64.82 | +1.31% | 13.5B | 41.55 | $1.56 | +0.46% |
| HIMS | $54.79 | -3.49% | 11.8B | 80.57 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CL vs PG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 391.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while PG trades at $166.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while UL trades at $62.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KMB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while KMB trades at $139.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KVUE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while KVUE trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while EL trades at $68.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -28.47. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CHD Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while CHD trades at $99.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CLX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while CLX trades at $130.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SGI Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while SGI trades at $64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HIMS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while HIMS trades at $54.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 80.57. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ELF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while ELF trades at $114.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NTCO Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs IPAR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while IPAR trades at $136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs COTY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while COTY trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NWL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while NWL trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SPB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while SPB trades at $55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EPC Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while EPC trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HELE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 633.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while HELE trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NUS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while NUS trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs PHH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while PHH trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 677.00. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SLSN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while SLSN trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 84.80. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EWCZ Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while EWCZ trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SKIN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while SKIN trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ACU Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while ACU trades at $39.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs GROV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while GROV trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while UG trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs RAY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while RAY trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs MTEX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while MTEX trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -88.18. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs DSY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while DSY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TANH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while TANH trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TKLF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while TKLF trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSHW Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs REV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SUMR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 73.4B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $90.60, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 25.67, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.