Colgate-Palmolive Company
Colgate-Palmolive Company CL Peers
See (CL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | $88.17 | -0.56% | 71.5B | 24.98 | $3.53 | +2.29% |
| PG | $160.39 | -0.40% | 376B | 25.50 | $6.29 | +2.54% |
| UL | $62.36 | +0.01% | 153.3B | 23.71 | $2.63 | +3.12% |
| KMB | $129.92 | -0.16% | 43.1B | 17.70 | $7.34 | +3.82% |
| KVUE | $21.20 | -0.82% | 40.7B | 37.85 | $0.56 | +3.86% |
| EL | $77.02 | -2.30% | 27.7B | -31.83 | -$2.42 | +2.17% |
| CHD | $96.04 | -0.94% | 23.7B | 41.22 | $2.33 | +1.20% |
| CLX | $122.04 | -0.21% | 15B | 21.91 | $5.57 | +4.00% |
| SGI | $67.22 | +1.64% | 14B | 43.09 | $1.56 | +0.46% |
| HIMS | $42.95 | +2.30% | 9.3B | 63.15 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CL vs PG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 376B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while PG trades at $160.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 153.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while UL trades at $62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KMB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while KMB trades at $129.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs KVUE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while KVUE trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 37.85. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while EL trades at $77.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CHD Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while CHD trades at $96.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs CLX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while CLX trades at $122.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SGI Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while SGI trades at $67.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HIMS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while HIMS trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 63.15. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ELF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while ELF trades at $121.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NTCO Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs IPAR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while IPAR trades at $133.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs COTY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while COTY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NWL Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while NWL trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SPB Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while SPB trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EPC Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while EPC trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs PHH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 828.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while PHH trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 1571.50. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs HELE Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 643.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while HELE trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs NUS Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while NUS trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SLSN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while SLSN trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 104.60. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SKIN Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while SKIN trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs EWCZ Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while EWCZ trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs ACU Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while ACU trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs GROV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while GROV trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs UG Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while UG trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs RAY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while RAY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs MTEX Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while MTEX trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -83.64. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs DSY Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while DSY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 139.70. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TANH Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while TANH trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs TKLF Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while TKLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs BRSHW Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs SUMR Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.
CL vs REV Comparison
CL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CL stands at 71.5B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CL is priced at $88.17, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.98, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CL's ROE is +10.23%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CL.