Cadeler A/S
Cadeler A/S CDLR Peers
See (CDLR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDLR | $19.75 | -5.23% | 1.7B | 16.40 | $1.20 | N/A |
| KEX | $117.39 | +1.99% | 6.6B | 23.26 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $114.76 | +0.30% | 3.7B | 7.61 | $15.07 | +1.18% |
| SB-PC | $26.04 | +0.93% | 2.7B | 17.27 | $1.51 | +5.39% |
| SB-PD | $25.45 | -0.31% | 2.6B | 16.88 | $1.51 | +5.39% |
| HAFN | $5.09 | +1.80% | 2.6B | 4.25 | $1.20 | +17.97% |
| SBLK | $17.95 | +3.28% | 2.1B | 9.40 | $1.91 | +8.06% |
| ZIM | $16.14 | -0.37% | 1.9B | 0.89 | $18.21 | +52.17% |
| BWLP | $12.37 | +4.56% | 1.9B | 6.60 | $1.87 | +13.80% |
| CMBT | $9.43 | +4.43% | 1.8B | 4.24 | $2.21 | +12.27% |
Stock Comparison
CDLR vs KEX Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while KEX trades at $117.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs MATX Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while MATX trades at $114.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SB-PC Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SB-PC trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SB-PD Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SB-PD trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs HAFN Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while HAFN trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SBLK Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SBLK trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ZIM Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ZIM trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs BWLP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while BWLP trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMBT Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMBT trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs DAC Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while DAC trades at $86.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GOGL Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GOGL trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CCEC Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CCEC trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SFL Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SFL trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SBBA Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMRE-PD Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMRE-PB Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMRE-PC Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMRE-PC trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NMM Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NMM trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMRE Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMRE trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMRE-PE Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CPLP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GSL Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 944.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GSL trades at $26.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GSL-PB Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 926.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GSL-PB trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ECO Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 713.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ECO trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GNK Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 593.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GNK trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NAT Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NAT trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GRIN Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 500M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GRIN trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is -51.84. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NETI Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ASC Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ASC trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SB Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 380.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SB trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CLCO Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 372.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CLCO trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs PANL Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while PANL trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ESEA Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ESEA trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs HSHP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while HSHP trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GASS Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GASS trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs KNOP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while KNOP trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CMDB Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CMDB trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ESEAV Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs DSX-PB Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while DSX-PB trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs DSX Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while DSX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SMHI Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SMHI trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SHIP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SHIP trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs HMR Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while HMR trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -20.65. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HMR's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NCT Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NCT trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs UFG Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while UFG trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NM Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs PXSAP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs EHLDV Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs TORO Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while TORO trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -55.25. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NM-PG Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs PXS Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while PXS trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs EDRY Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while EDRY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs TOPS Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while TOPS trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CACO Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs HTCO Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while HTCO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs GLBS Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while GLBS trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs NM-PH Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs EHLD Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while EHLD trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs PSHG Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while PSHG trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CTRM Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CTRM trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs USEA Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while USEA trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs OP Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while OP trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs ICON Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while ICON trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs EGLE Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while EGLE trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs CISS Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while CISS trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CISS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs PXSAW Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 242.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SHIPW Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SHIPZ Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs SBLKZ Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.
CDLR vs TOROV Comparison
CDLR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDLR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDLR is priced at $19.75, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDLR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.40, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDLR's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDLR is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDLR.