Comcast Holdings Corp.
Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ | $64.38 | +0.00% | 16B | 54.93 | $1.17 | +2.80% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.87 | +0.19% | 3.4B | 9.97 | $2.09 | +2.40% |
| GTN-A | $12.21 | +0.49% | 635.2M | 26.05 | $0.43 | +6.79% |
| NMAX | $5.59 | -0.53% | 500.7M | -6.48 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| IHRT | $3.51 | -2.77% | 445M | -1.34 | -$2.58 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.88 | +0.21% | 432.9M | 10.88 | $0.43 | +6.79% |
| FUBO | $1.27 | +2.42% | 423.3M | 3.75 | $0.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCZ vs LSXMA Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMA's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMK Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMK's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMB Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMB's competition here
CCZ vs TGNA Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while TGNA trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check TGNA's competition here
CCZ vs GTN-A Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 635.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while GTN-A trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check GTN-A's competition here
CCZ vs NMAX Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 500.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while NMAX trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check NMAX's competition here
CCZ vs IHRT Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 445M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while IHRT trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check IHRT's competition here
CCZ vs GTN Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while GTN trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check GTN's competition here
CCZ vs FUBO Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 423.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while FUBO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check FUBO's competition here
CCZ vs SSP Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while SSP trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SSP's competition here
CCZ vs EVC Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while EVC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check EVC's competition here
CCZ vs CURI Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while CURI trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -31.20. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CURI's competition here
CCZ vs SGA Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while SGA trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 237.40. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SGA's competition here
CCZ vs SJ Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while SJ trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SJ's competition here
CCZ vs UONEK Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while UONEK trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONEK's competition here
CCZ vs MDIA Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while MDIA trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check MDIA's competition here
CCZ vs UONE Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while UONE trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONE's competition here
CCZ vs AUD Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check AUD's competition here
CCZ vs SALM Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while SALM trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and SALM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SALM's competition here
CCZ vs BBGI Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while BBGI trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check BBGI's competition here
CCZ vs XHLD Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while XHLD trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check XHLD's competition here
CCZ vs CMLS Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while CMLS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +10.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CMLS's competition here
CCZ vs CURIW Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and CURIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CURIW's competition here
CCZ vs DISCA Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check DISCA's competition here
CCZ vs QVCD Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while QVCD trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCD's competition here
CCZ vs QVCC Comparison February 2026
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 16B. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $64.38, while QVCC trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 54.93, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCC's competition here