Comcast Holdings Corp.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while RGLXY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FJTNY trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and FJTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while ITVPY trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and ITVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FJTNF trades at $17.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while ITVPF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TGNA trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while NMAX trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -40.59. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SGBAF trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SGBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while BECVY trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVAHF trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while THDDY trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while PBSFY trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVFCF trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GETVF trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 889.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FUBO trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 430.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while STGYF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STGYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 419.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GTN-A trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and GTN-A have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 404.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GTN trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 263.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CURI trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 209.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SSP trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 174.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while EVC trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 165.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVBCY trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 154.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while IHRT trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 74.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SGA trades at $11.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 55.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 43.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MDIA trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 36.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SALM trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 35.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while UONEK trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 34.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SJ trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 34.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while UONE trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 22.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while XHLD trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 19.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LUDG trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LUDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 18.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while EMMS trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AUD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 9.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while BBGI trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 5.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FHLD trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and FHLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 5.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CURIW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AOECF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TVTV trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LPTV trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while PEGX trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while INCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CMLS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TLDE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 994133.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SBSAA trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and SBSAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785317.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 658878.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AITVF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648504.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TFBN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348127.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while PSRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 344996.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TMGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and TMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155000.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MEMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84769.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FONU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59867.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while WTKN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9836.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while WNRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WNRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 525.00. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MNIZ trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, QVCD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while QVCD trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, MCTZF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, ALLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while ALLN trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, QVCC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while QVCC trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, DISCA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while DISCA trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.

CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59.02B. In comparison, GETVY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GETVY trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).