Comcast Holdings Corp.
Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ | $60.85 | +0.00% | 57.6B | 51.92 | $1.17 | +2.23% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $21.00 | +2.34% | 3.2B | 7.33 | $2.75 | +2.47% |
| FUBO | $3.70 | +2.07% | 1.3B | 19.84 | $0.19 | N/A |
| NMAX | $11.99 | -0.99% | 1.3B | -38.75 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $11.22 | +16.53% | 630.2M | 6.75 | $1.53 | +5.52% |
| GTN | $6.00 | +2.04% | 536M | 3.79 | $1.53 | +5.52% |
| IHRT | $2.26 | +0.44% | 288.9M | -0.93 | -$2.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCZ vs LSXMA Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMA's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMK Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMK's competition here
CCZ vs LSXMB Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check LSXMB's competition here
CCZ vs TGNA Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while TGNA trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check TGNA's competition here
CCZ vs FUBO Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while FUBO trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FUBO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check FUBO's competition here
CCZ vs NMAX Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while NMAX trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check NMAX's competition here
CCZ vs GTN-A Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 630.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while GTN-A trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and GTN-A have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTN-A's competition here
CCZ vs GTN Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while GTN trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check GTN's competition here
CCZ vs IHRT Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 288.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while IHRT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check IHRT's competition here
CCZ vs SSP Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while SSP trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SSP's competition here
CCZ vs CURI Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while CURI trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -46.78. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CURI's competition here
CCZ vs EVC Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while EVC trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check EVC's competition here
CCZ vs SGA Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while SGA trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SGA's competition here
CCZ vs MDIA Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while MDIA trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MDIA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check MDIA's competition here
CCZ vs UONEK Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while UONEK trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONEK's competition here
CCZ vs UONE Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while UONE trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check UONE's competition here
CCZ vs SJ Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while SJ trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SJ's competition here
CCZ vs SALM Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while SALM trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check SALM's competition here
CCZ vs AUD Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AUD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check AUD's competition here
CCZ vs XHLD Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while XHLD trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -10.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check XHLD's competition here
CCZ vs BBGI Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while BBGI trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check BBGI's competition here
CCZ vs CMLS Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while CMLS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CMLS's competition here
CCZ vs CURIW Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while CURIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check CURIW's competition here
CCZ vs QVCC Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while QVCC trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCC's competition here
CCZ vs DISCA Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check DISCA's competition here
CCZ vs QVCD Comparison August 2025
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 57.6B. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $60.85, while QVCD trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 51.92, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.26%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.Check QVCD's competition here