Comcast Holdings Corp.
Comcast Holdings Corp. CCZ Peers
See (CCZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCZ | $62.31 | +7.90% | 59B | 53.17 | $1.17 | +3.64% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $16.41 | +1.74% | 2.6B | 5.80 | $2.83 | +3.84% |
| NMAX | $16.78 | +3.81% | 1.6B | -46.61 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| FUBO | $3.43 | +1.93% | 1.2B | 17.12 | $0.20 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $8.00 | -0.74% | 442.3M | 3.42 | $2.34 | +8.50% |
| GTN | $3.81 | +4.68% | 350.8M | 1.63 | $2.34 | +8.50% |
| CURI | $5.65 | -1.91% | 321.7M | -40.36 | -$0.14 | +2.97% |
Stock Comparison
CCZ vs LSXMK Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs LSXMA Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs LSXMB Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs TGNA Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while TGNA trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs NMAX Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while NMAX trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -46.61. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs FUBO Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while FUBO trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs GTN-A Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GTN-A trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs GTN Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while GTN trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs CURI Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CURI trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -40.36. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs IHRT Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while IHRT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs SSP Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SSP trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs EVC Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 189.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while EVC trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs SGA Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SGA trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs MDIA Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while MDIA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs UONEK Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while UONEK trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs UONE Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while UONE trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs SJ Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SJ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs SALM Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while SALM trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs AUD Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs XHLD Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while XHLD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs BBGI Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while BBGI trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs CURIW Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CURIW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs CMLS Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while CMLS trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ and CMLS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CCZ vs QVCD Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while QVCD trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs QVCC Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while QVCC trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.
CCZ vs DISCA Comparison
CCZ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCZ stands at 59B. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCZ is priced at $62.31, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCZ currently has a P/E ratio of 53.17, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CCZ's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCZ is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCZ.