China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corporation Ltd
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAOLF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corporation Ltd (CAOLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAOLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAOLF | $1.74 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 13.38 | $0.13 | +1.64% |
| JXHLY | $18.25 | -10.10% | 25.4B | 82.95 | $0.22 | +1.85% |
| JXHGF | $8.99 | +0.00% | 24.2B | 81.73 | $0.11 | +2.22% |
| NTOIF | $31.33 | -2.10% | 24.1B | 142.40 | $0.22 | +0.55% |
| NTOIY | $15.65 | +1.95% | 24B | 142.27 | $0.11 | +0.23% |
| IDKOY | $21.01 | +7.52% | 12.9B | 48.86 | $0.43 | +1.82% |
| IDKOF | $9.65 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 43.86 | $0.22 | +2.52% |
| KUNUF | $1.15 | +0.00% | 10B | 11.50 | $0.10 | +3.78% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| KLYCY | $9.21 | -19.00% | 8B | 10.35 | $0.89 | +4.70% |
Stock Comparison
CAOLF vs JXHLY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while JXHLY trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check JXHLY's competition here
CAOLF vs JXHGF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while JXHGF trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 81.73. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check JXHGF's competition here
CAOLF vs NTOIF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while NTOIF trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is 142.40. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check NTOIF's competition here
CAOLF vs NTOIY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while NTOIY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is 142.27. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check NTOIY's competition here
CAOLF vs IDKOY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while IDKOY trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check IDKOY's competition here
CAOLF vs IDKOF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while IDKOF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check IDKOF's competition here
CAOLF vs KUNUF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while KUNUF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and KUNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUNUF's competition here
CAOLF vs SAAFY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check SAAFY's competition here
CAOLF vs KLYCY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while KLYCY trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check KLYCY's competition here
CAOLF vs MOHCY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while MOHCY trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check MOHCY's competition here
CAOLF vs DCCPY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while DCCPY trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check DCCPY's competition here
CAOLF vs DCCPF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while DCCPF trades at $61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check DCCPF's competition here
CAOLF vs CTXAY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while CTXAY trades at $46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 100.13. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and CTXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAY's competition here
CAOLF vs PKIUF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while PKIUF trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check PKIUF's competition here
CAOLF vs TOIPF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while TOIPF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and TOIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOIPF's competition here
CAOLF vs PNADF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNADF's competition here
CAOLF vs RBSFY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while RBSFY trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check RBSFY's competition here
CAOLF vs RUBSF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while RUBSF trades at $41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and RUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBSF's competition here
CAOLF vs SHIIY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check SHIIY's competition here
CAOLF vs CTXAF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and CTXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAF's competition here
CAOLF vs TOIPY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while TOIPY trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOIPY's competition here
CAOLF vs MOHCF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check MOHCF's competition here
CAOLF vs FJLLF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while FJLLF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check FJLLF's competition here
CAOLF vs PKCPY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while PKCPY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKCPY's competition here
CAOLF vs OILRF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while OILRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check OILRF's competition here
CAOLF vs FGPRB Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while FGPRB trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check FGPRB's competition here
CAOLF vs IRPSY Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while IRPSY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and IRPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRPSY's competition here
CAOLF vs TPHIF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPHIF's competition here
CAOLF vs NZRFF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while NZRFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check NZRFF's competition here
CAOLF vs REGX Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REGX's competition here
CAOLF vs FGPR Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while FGPR trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGPR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check FGPR's competition here
CAOLF vs CLSZF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while CLSZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check CLSZF's competition here
CAOLF vs BDCO Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while BDCO trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check BDCO's competition here
CAOLF vs ISRJF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while ISRJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISRJF's competition here
CAOLF vs LCNTU Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while LCNTU trades at $460.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and LCNTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCNTU's competition here
CAOLF vs WTLC Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLC's competition here
CAOLF vs SRNW Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while SRNW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -7.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check SRNW's competition here
CAOLF vs DVFI Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVFI's competition here
CAOLF vs BERI Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while BERI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BERI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check BERI's competition here
CAOLF vs QREE Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while QREE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QREE's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check QREE's competition here
CAOLF vs IAHL Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAHL's competition here
CAOLF vs ABLE Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 30. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAOLF.Check ABLE's competition here
CAOLF vs LNKE Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNKE's competition here
CAOLF vs TOAOF Comparison April 2026
CAOLF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAOLF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAOLF is priced at $1.74, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAOLF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, CAOLF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAOLF and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAOF's competition here