Cable One, Inc.
Cable One, Inc. (CABO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CABO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CABO | $102.34 | -2.70% | 592M | -1.30 | -$80.59 | N/A |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TMUS | $220.21 | +2.28% | 241B | 22.14 | $9.73 | +1.70% |
| VZ | $50.18 | +3.17% | 207.8B | 11.99 | $4.11 | +5.56% |
| T | $28.55 | +2.40% | 198.5B | 9.21 | $3.04 | +3.96% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| T-PA | $21.03 | -0.05% | 151.2B | 8.87 | $2.38 | +3.96% |
| T-PC | $19.59 | -0.28% | 140.4B | 8.24 | $2.38 | +3.96% |
| TBB | $22.68 | -0.07% | 139.9B | 4.45 | $5.12 | +3.96% |
| CMCSA | $31.55 | +0.55% | 114.2B | 5.81 | $5.39 | +4.02% |
Stock Comparison
CABO vs VZA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check VZA's competition here
CABO vs TMUS Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TMUS trades at $220.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TMUS's competition here
CABO vs VZ Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while VZ trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check VZ's competition here
CABO vs T Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 198.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while T trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas T's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check T's competition here
CABO vs TBC Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TBC's competition here
CABO vs T-PA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while T-PA trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check T-PA's competition here
CABO vs T-PC Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while T-PC trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check T-PC's competition here
CABO vs TBB Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TBB trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TBB's competition here
CABO vs CMCSA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CMCSA trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CMCSA's competition here
CABO vs AMX Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while AMX trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check AMX's competition here
CABO vs AMOV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check AMOV's competition here
CABO vs VOD Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while VOD trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check VOD's competition here
CABO vs CHT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CHT trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CHT's competition here
CABO vs CHTR Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CHTR trades at $226.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CHTR's competition here
CABO vs ORAN Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ORAN's competition here
CABO vs VIV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while VIV trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check VIV's competition here
CABO vs BCE Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while BCE trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check BCE's competition here
CABO vs TEF Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TEF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TEF's competition here
CABO vs TU Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TU trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TU's competition here
CABO vs TLK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TLK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TLK's competition here
CABO vs RCI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while RCI trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check RCI's competition here
CABO vs SJR Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check SJR's competition here
CABO vs LBDAV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBDAV's competition here
CABO vs LBDKV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBDKV's competition here
CABO vs TIMB Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TIMB trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TIMB's competition here
CABO vs SKM Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while SKM trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check SKM's competition here
CABO vs KT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while KT trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check KT's competition here
CABO vs TIGO Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TIGO trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TIGO's competition here
CABO vs FYBR Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while FYBR trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check FYBR's competition here
CABO vs MBT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check MBT's competition here
CABO vs CTDD Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CTDD trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CTDD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CTDD's competition here
CABO vs LUMN Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LUMN trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LUMN's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LUMN's competition here
CABO vs LBRDK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBRDK trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBRDK's competition here
CABO vs LBRDA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBRDA trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBRDA's competition here
CABO vs GSAT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GSAT trades at $60.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -130.65. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GSAT's competition here
CABO vs UZE Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while UZE trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check UZE's competition here
CABO vs UZF Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while UZF trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check UZF's competition here
CABO vs UZD Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while UZD trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check UZD's competition here
CABO vs USM Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check USM's competition here
CABO vs TKC Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TKC trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TKC's competition here
CABO vs PHI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while PHI trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check PHI's competition here
CABO vs TEO Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TEO trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TEO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TEO's competition here
CABO vs TDS Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TDS trades at $44.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -73.04. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TDS's competition here
CABO vs TDS-PV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TDS-PV trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TDS-PV's competition here
CABO vs TDS-PU Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TDS-PU trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TDS-PU's competition here
CABO vs LBTYB Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBTYB trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBTYB's competition here
CABO vs AD Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while AD trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to AD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check AD's competition here
CABO vs LBYKV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBYKV's competition here
CABO vs LBTYA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBTYA trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBTYA's competition here
CABO vs CTBB Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CTBB trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CTBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CTBB's competition here
CABO vs LBTYK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBTYK trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBTYK's competition here
CABO vs SNRE Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check SNRE's competition here
CABO vs VEON Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while VEON trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check VEON's competition here
CABO vs LBRDP Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LBRDP trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LBRDP's competition here
CABO vs DISH Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DISH's ROE of -7555.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check DISH's competition here
CABO vs KYIV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while KYIV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check KYIV's competition here
CABO vs IHS Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while IHS trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IHS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check IHS's competition here
CABO vs IRDM Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while IRDM trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check IRDM's competition here
CABO vs TV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TV's competition here
CABO vs ASTSW Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ASTSW's competition here
CABO vs LILAK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LILAK trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LILAK's competition here
CABO vs LILA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while LILA trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check LILA's competition here
CABO vs RADI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check RADI's competition here
CABO vs DVGR Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, DVGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while DVGR trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas DVGR's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DVGR's ROE of -13.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to DVGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check DVGR's competition here
CABO vs GLIBA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GLIBA trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GLIBA's competition here
CABO vs IDT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while IDT trades at $49.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check IDT's competition here
CABO vs GLIBK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GLIBK trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GLIBK's competition here
CABO vs SIFY Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while SIFY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check SIFY's competition here
CABO vs CCOI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 912.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CCOI trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CCOI's competition here
CABO vs ATUS Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ATUS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ATUS's competition here
CABO vs SHEN Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while SHEN trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check SHEN's competition here
CABO vs OPTU Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while OPTU trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check OPTU's competition here
CABO vs ATEX Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ATEX trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ATEX's competition here
CABO vs GOGO Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 587.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GOGO trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -87.80. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GOGO's competition here
CABO vs CNSL Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CNSL's competition here
CABO vs WOW Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while WOW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check WOW's competition here
CABO vs ATNI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 427.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ATNI trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ATNI's competition here
CABO vs RBBN Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while RBBN trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RBBN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check RBBN's competition here
CABO vs OOMA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while OOMA trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 147.75. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check OOMA's competition here
CABO vs HCHC Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check HCHC's competition here
CABO vs RDCM Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while RDCM trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check RDCM's competition here
CABO vs CXDO Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while CXDO trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check CXDO's competition here
CABO vs GLBKV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GLBKV's competition here
CABO vs GLBAV Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check GLBAV's competition here
CABO vs MTSL Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check MTSL's competition here
CABO vs KORE Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while KORE trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check KORE's competition here
CABO vs TDI Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while TDI trades at $44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check TDI's competition here
CABO vs FNGR Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while FNGR trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check FNGR's competition here
CABO vs KYIVW Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while KYIVW trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check KYIVW's competition here
CABO vs ELWT Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ELWT trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ELWT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ELWT's competition here
CABO vs ANTE Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while ANTE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check ANTE's competition here
CABO vs MIMO Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check MIMO's competition here
CABO vs UCL Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while UCL trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check UCL's competition here
CABO vs IQST Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while IQST trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check IQST's competition here
CABO vs QTEK Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check QTEK's competition here
CABO vs QTEKW Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check QTEKW's competition here
CABO vs PCLA Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while PCLA trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check PCLA's competition here
CABO vs COMSP Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 539. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check COMSP's competition here
CABO vs COMSW Comparison February 2026
CABO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CABO stands at 592M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, CABO is priced at $102.34, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CABO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.30, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CABO's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CABO is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CABO.Check COMSW's competition here