Buda Juice Inc.
Buda Juice Inc. (BUDA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BUDA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUDA | $10.39 | +0.00% | 133.5M | 50.19 | $0.21 | N/A |
| KO | $78.91 | +0.00% | 343.4B | 26.26 | $3.04 | +2.56% |
| PEP | $164.59 | +0.00% | 225.5B | 27.44 | $6.01 | +3.41% |
| MNST | $81.99 | +0.00% | 81.8B | 47.59 | $1.76 | N/A |
| CCEP | $104.70 | +0.00% | 47.5B | 26.69 | $3.96 | +2.18% |
| KDP | $29.10 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 25.47 | $1.16 | +3.12% |
| KOF | $112.10 | +0.00% | 23.8B | 43.50 | $2.60 | +3.26% |
| COKE | $176.79 | +0.00% | 15.3B | 25.96 | $7.02 | +0.55% |
| CELH | $44.13 | +0.00% | 12.5B | 402.67 | $0.12 | N/A |
| PRMB | $18.69 | +0.00% | 6.9B | -144.15 | -$0.13 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
BUDA vs KO Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 343.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while KO trades at $78.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check KO's competition here
BUDA vs PEP Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while PEP trades at $164.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check PEP's competition here
BUDA vs MNST Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while MNST trades at $81.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 47.59. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check MNST's competition here
BUDA vs CCEP Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while CCEP trades at $104.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check CCEP's competition here
BUDA vs KDP Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while KDP trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check KDP's competition here
BUDA vs KOF Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while KOF trades at $112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check KOF's competition here
BUDA vs COKE Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while COKE trades at $176.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check COKE's competition here
BUDA vs CELH Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while CELH trades at $44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 402.67. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check CELH's competition here
BUDA vs PRMB Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while PRMB trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -144.15. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check PRMB's competition here
BUDA vs AKO-B Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while AKO-B trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check AKO-B's competition here
BUDA vs AKO-A Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while AKO-A trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check AKO-A's competition here
BUDA vs PRMW Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check PRMW's competition here
BUDA vs FIZZ Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while FIZZ trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check FIZZ's competition here
BUDA vs COCO Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while COCO trades at $51.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 46.92. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check COCO's competition here
BUDA vs CHA Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while CHA trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check CHA's competition here
BUDA vs OTLY Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while OTLY trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to OTLY's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check OTLY's competition here
BUDA vs ZVIA Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while ZVIA trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check ZVIA's competition here
BUDA vs SHOT Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check SHOT's competition here
BUDA vs BRFH Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while BRFH trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check BRFH's competition here
BUDA vs BNKK Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while BNKK trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check BNKK's competition here
BUDA vs REED Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while REED trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas REED's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to REED's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check REED's competition here
BUDA vs BNKKW Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check BNKKW's competition here
BUDA vs NBEV Comparison February 2026
BUDA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BUDA stands at 133.5M. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BUDA is priced at $10.39, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BUDA currently has a P/E ratio of 50.19, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BUDA's ROE is N/A, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BUDA is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BUDA.Check NBEV's competition here