Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTU | $16.50 | -3.11% | 2.1B | 15.86 | $1.09 | +1.75% |
| CNR | $75.46 | -0.62% | 3.9B | 34.60 | $2.20 | +0.26% |
| ARLP | $26.36 | +2.57% | 3.2B | 13.90 | $1.82 | +10.71% |
| HCC | $54.85 | -8.09% | 3.2B | 79.93 | $0.76 | +0.53% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.71% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +0.37% |
| AMR | $123.27 | -4.77% | 2B | 73.28 | $2.05 | N/A |
| NRP | $104.16 | -0.12% | 1.4B | 9.68 | $10.67 | +4.09% |
| METC | $20.52 | -5.31% | 1.2B | -50.11 | -$0.45 | +2.18% |
| METCB | $13.24 | -5.36% | 1.1B | -30.76 | -$0.45 | +5.92% |
Stock Comparison
BTU vs CNR Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while CNR trades at $75.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CNR's competition here
BTU vs ARLP Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while ARLP trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARLP's competition here
BTU vs HCC Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while HCC trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 79.93. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HCC's competition here
BTU vs CEIX Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CEIX's competition here
BTU vs ARCH Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARCH's competition here
BTU vs AMR Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while AMR trades at $123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is 73.28. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AMR's competition here
BTU vs NRP Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while NRP trades at $104.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NRP's competition here
BTU vs METC Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while METC trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -50.11. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METC's competition here
BTU vs METCB Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while METCB trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -30.76. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCB's competition here
BTU vs METCL Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCL's competition here
BTU vs HNRG Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while HNRG trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HNRG's competition here
BTU vs SXC Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 633.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while SXC trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SXC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check SXC's competition here
BTU vs NC Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while NC trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NC's competition here
BTU vs AREC Comparison August 2025
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $16.50, while AREC trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 15.86, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AREC's competition here