Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation BTU Peers
See (BTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTU | $15.25 | +2.76% | 1.9B | 5.65 | $2.70 | +2.45% |
| CNR | $75.60 | +4.44% | 4B | 15.62 | $4.84 | +0.26% |
| ARLP | $27.33 | +1.79% | 3.5B | 12.84 | $2.13 | +10.25% |
| HCC | $52.97 | +3.48% | 2.8B | 26.47 | $2.00 | +0.60% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.59% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +0.37% |
| AMR | $122.59 | +4.34% | 1.6B | 60.13 | $2.04 | N/A |
| NRP | $98.29 | +0.05% | 1.3B | 9.44 | $10.57 | +4.29% |
| METCB | $11.97 | +15.76% | 933M | -149.87 | -$0.08 | +9.69% |
| METC | $16.62 | -0.06% | 840.4M | -207.75 | -$0.08 | +3.66% |
Stock Comparison
BTU vs CNR Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while CNR trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs ARLP Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while ARLP trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs HCC Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while HCC trades at $52.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs CEIX Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEIX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs ARCH Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs AMR Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while AMR trades at $122.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is 60.13. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs NRP Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while NRP trades at $98.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs METCB Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 933M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while METCB trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -149.87. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs METC Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while METC trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -207.75. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs SXC Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 747M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while SXC trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SXC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs HNRG Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 688.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while HNRG trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs METCL Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while METCL trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs NC Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 301.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while NC trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.
BTU vs AREC Comparison
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $15.25, while AREC trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.65, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.