Bruush Oral Care Inc.
Bruush Oral Care Inc. BRSHW Peers
See (BRSHW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRSHW | $0.01 | +14.29% | 6.1K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PG | $157.05 | -0.91% | 368B | 24.91 | $6.30 | +2.59% |
| UL | $60.79 | -1.10% | 149.3B | 22.51 | $2.70 | +3.94% |
| CL | $89.58 | -1.15% | 72.6B | 25.38 | $3.53 | +2.81% |
| KMB | $129.38 | -1.95% | 42.9B | 17.60 | $7.35 | +4.76% |
| KVUE | $21.34 | +2.01% | 41B | 38.13 | $0.56 | +3.83% |
| EL | $91.08 | -1.11% | 32.8B | -37.63 | -$2.42 | +2.60% |
| CHD | $98.05 | -1.05% | 24.1B | 42.07 | $2.33 | +1.18% |
| CLX | $126.54 | -1.02% | 15.6B | 22.71 | $5.57 | +4.80% |
| SGI | $71.17 | -2.43% | 14.8B | 45.63 | $1.56 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
BRSHW vs PG Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 368B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while PG trades at $157.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs UL Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while UL trades at $60.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs CL Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while CL trades at $89.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs KMB Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while KMB trades at $129.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs KVUE Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while KVUE trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs EL Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while EL trades at $91.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -37.63. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs CHD Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while CHD trades at $98.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs CLX Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while CLX trades at $126.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs SGI Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while SGI trades at $71.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs HIMS Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while HIMS trades at $47.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 70.46. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs ELF Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while ELF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs NTCO Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs COTY Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while COTY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs IPAR Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while IPAR trades at $135.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs NWL Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while NWL trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs SPB Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while SPB trades at $57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs EPC Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while EPC trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs HELE Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while HELE trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs NUS Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 457.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while NUS trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs SKIN Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while SKIN trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs SLSN Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 236.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while SLSN trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs EWCZ Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 231.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while EWCZ trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs ACU Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while ACU trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs DSY Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while DSY trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs GROV Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while GROV trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs UG Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while UG trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs RAY Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while RAY trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs PHH Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while PHH trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 53.05. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs MTEX Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while MTEX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -75.09. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs BRSH Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs TANH Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while TANH trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs TKLF Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while TKLF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is -28.79. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs SUMR Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.
BRSHW vs REV Comparison
BRSHW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRSHW stands at 6.1K. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRSHW is priced at $0.01, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRSHW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BRSHW's ROE is +1.19%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BRSHW is more volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRSHW.