Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BRLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRLT | $1.54 | +4.05% | 98.5M | -51.33 | -$0.03 | +16.43% |
| TPR | $160.49 | +2.28% | 32.8B | 61.96 | $2.59 | +0.94% |
| SIG | $100.20 | +1.96% | 4.1B | 30.19 | $3.32 | +1.28% |
| REAL | $12.39 | +3.08% | 3.6B | -12.27 | -$1.01 | N/A |
| CPRI | $20.78 | +2.57% | 2.5B | -2.12 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LUXE | $9.61 | -0.21% | 938.9M | 1.70 | $5.71 | N/A |
| MOV | $25.45 | -0.24% | 398.8M | 26.22 | $0.97 | +5.48% |
| ELA | $13.45 | +2.91% | 353.1M | 34.87 | $0.39 | N/A |
| FOSL | $4.80 | -0.83% | 270.7M | -3.78 | -$1.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BRLT vs TPR Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while TPR trades at $160.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 61.96. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check TPR's competition here
BRLT vs SIG Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while SIG trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check SIG's competition here
BRLT vs REAL Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while REAL trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check REAL's competition here
BRLT vs CPRI Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while CPRI trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check CPRI's competition here
BRLT vs MYTE Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MYTE's competition here
BRLT vs LUXE Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 938.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while LUXE trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LUXE's competition here
BRLT vs MOV Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while MOV trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MOV's competition here
BRLT vs ELA Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while ELA trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check ELA's competition here
BRLT vs FOSL Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while FOSL trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSL's competition here
BRLT vs TOPW Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while TOPW trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -1033.00. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check TOPW's competition here
BRLT vs LANV Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while LANV trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LANV's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LANV's competition here
BRLT vs FOSLL Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSLL's competition here
BRLT vs BGI Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while BGI trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check BGI's competition here
BRLT vs FMFC Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while FMFC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is 43.37. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FMFC's competition here
BRLT vs CTHR Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 405.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while CTHR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check CTHR's competition here
BRLT vs JEWL Comparison February 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 98.5M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.54, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -51.33, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check JEWL's competition here