Bank of America Corporation
Bank of America Corporation BML-PH Peers
See (BML-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
BML-PH vs JPM Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 703.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM trades at $253.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 694.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PD Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 693.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PD trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 444.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PL trades at $1,179.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 335.67. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs IDCBY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 328.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while IDCBY trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs IDCBF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 318.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while IDCBF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 314.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH and BAC have similar daily volatility (0.69).
BML-PH vs BML-PJ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 313.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BML-PJ trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BML-PL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 313.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BML-PL trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BML-PG Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 312.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BML-PG trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PK Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 308.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PK trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PB Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 307.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PB trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PE Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 307.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PE trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BACRP Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 305.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BACRP trades at $193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ACGBY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 262.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ACGBY trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFCNP Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 238.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFCNP trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 237.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PC trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.28. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH and WFC-PC have similar daily volatility (0.69).
BML-PH vs WFC-PL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 236.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PL trades at $1,167.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 241.62. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 235.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC trades at $72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ACGBF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 228.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ACGBF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CICHY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 218.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CICHY trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BACHY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 216.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BACHY trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BACHF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 210.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BACHF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CICHF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 206.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CICHF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PQ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs HSBC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 200.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while HSBC trades at $56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs HBCYF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 199.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while HBCYF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 187.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PR Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CMWAY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 180.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CMWAY trades at $107.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CBAUF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 171.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CBAUF trades at $102.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs RY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 169.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while RY trades at $120.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PM Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 165.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PM trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PN Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 152.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PN trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs MUFG Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 145.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while MUFG trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PS Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 144.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PS trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs MBFJF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 143.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while MBFJF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs C Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 133.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while C trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas C's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PO Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 132.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PO trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PQ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 128.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BAC-PP Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 124.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BAC-PP trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs C-PJ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BCDRF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 114.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BCDRF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SAN Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 112.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SAN trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs TD Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 110.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while TD trades at $63.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs UBS Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 100.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while UBS trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs RY-PT Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SMFNF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 94.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SMFNF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SMFG Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 91.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SMFG trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BBVXF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 83.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BBVXF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BBVA Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 83.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BBVA trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BMO Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 72.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BMO trades at $99.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NABZY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 71.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NABZY trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BCMXY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 71.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BCMXY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BKFCF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 71.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WEBNF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 67.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WEBNF trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PZ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BNS Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 62.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BNS trades at $50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ING Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 62.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ING trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NU Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 62.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NU trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PA Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PA trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NAUBF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 60.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NAUBF trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CM Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 59.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CM trades at $63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BCS Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 58.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BCS trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BCLYF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 57.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BCLYF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs INGVF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 56.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while INGVF trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ANZGY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 55.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ANZGY trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PJ Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WFC-PD Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WFC-PD trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PL trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ANEWF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PK Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PK trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs RBSPF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 52.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while RBSPF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs JPM-PM Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while JPM-PM trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs C-PK Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NTIOF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 35.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NTIOF trades at $89.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NBKCF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 34.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SCBFY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 33.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SCBFY trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SCBFF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 33.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SCBFF trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs TDBKF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while TDBKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NWG Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NWG trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SVNLF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SVNLF trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs SVNLY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 25.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while SVNLY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs RBCPF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BNSPF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs FANDF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 21.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while FANDF trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs AAVMY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 17.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while AAVMY trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ABMRF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 17.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ABMRF trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BNDSF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BNDSF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BNDSY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 15.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BNDSY trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs EWBC Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 12.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while EWBC trades at $89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs EFGXY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs EFGIF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ALORY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ALORY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CSGKF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs CS Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs FANDY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while FANDY trades at $40.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs NTB Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while NTB trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs TANNL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs VUPPF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 612.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs PRRCF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while PRRCF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs FRC-PL Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs BCSO Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while BCSO trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs ANZBY Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, ANZBY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs WBK Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, WBK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
BML-PH vs TNTTF Comparison
BML-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BML-PH stands at 314.50B. In comparison, TNTTF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, BML-PH is priced at $21.50, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BML-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.12, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, BML-PH's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BML-PH is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BML-PH.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM | $253.07 | -0.16% | 703.30B | 12.42 | $20.38 | +1.99% |
| JPM-PC | $25.00 | +0.16% | 694.19B | 1.85 | $13.48 | +1.99% |
| JPM-PD | $24.24 | +0.25% | 693.08B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.99% |
| BAC-PL | $1,179.54 | +0.13% | 444.21B | 335.67 | $3.51 | +2.44% |
| IDCBY | $13.98 | +0.25% | 328.75B | 5.23 | $2.67 | +8.22% |
| IDCBF | $0.68 | -5.56% | 318.27B | 5.23 | $0.13 | +9.26% |
| BAC | $41.80 | +0.47% | 314.79B | 12.48 | $3.35 | +2.44% |
| BML-PH | $21.50 | +0.37% | 314.50B | 6.12 | $3.51 | +2.44% |
| BML-PJ | $22.54 | +0.16% | 313.84B | 6.41 | $3.51 | +2.44% |
| BML-PL | $21.45 | +0.09% | 313.62B | 6.10 | $3.51 | +2.44% |