Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. BEP-PA Peers
See (BEP-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEP-PA | $17.70 | +0.17% | 7.4B | -34.64 | -$0.51 | +5.67% |
| GEV | $505.07 | -0.18% | 137.8B | 72.77 | $6.94 | +0.05% |
| CEG | $306.63 | -0.42% | 96.1B | 32.31 | $9.49 | +0.48% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +4.67% |
| SMR | $35.21 | -2.52% | 10.4B | -25.68 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| BEP | $26.02 | +1.48% | 7.4B | -25.75 | -$1.01 | +5.67% |
| CWEN-A | $30.24 | +1.37% | 6.4B | 37.82 | $0.80 | +5.41% |
| CWEN | $31.97 | +1.30% | 6.4B | 39.95 | $0.80 | +5.41% |
| ORA | $84.64 | -0.14% | 5.1B | 41.07 | $2.06 | +0.56% |
| BEPC | $33.21 | +1.03% | 4.8B | -23.90 | -$1.39 | +4.41% |
Stock Comparison
BEP-PA vs GEV Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while GEV trades at $505.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 72.77. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs CEG Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while CEG trades at $306.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs AQNU Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs SMR Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while SMR trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -25.68. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs BEP Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while BEP trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs CWEN-A Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while CWEN-A trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs CWEN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while CWEN trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ORA Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ORA trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 41.07. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs BEPC Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while BEPC trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs AQN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while AQN trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs EE Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while EE trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ENLT Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ENLT trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs AY Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs SMR-WT Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs RNW Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while RNW trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 57.75. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs RNWWW Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while RNWWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs NEP Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs FLNC Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 977.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while FLNC trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs AMPS Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs NXXT Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while NXXT trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ELLO Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ELLO trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs VGAS Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while VGAS trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs NRGV Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while NRGV trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs AZRE Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs SUUN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while SUUN trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs BNRG Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while BNRG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs RAIN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while RAIN trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RAIN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs HLGN-WT Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs HLGN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while HLGN trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HLGN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs CREG Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while CREG trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ADN Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ADN trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADN's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs HTOO Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while HTOO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs WAVE Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while WAVE trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs HTOOW Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while HTOOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ALCE Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ALCE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALCE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ELIQ Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs ADNWW Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while ADNWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.
BEP-PA vs LFG Comparison
BEP-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEP-PA stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BEP-PA is priced at $17.70, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEP-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -34.64, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEP-PA's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEP-PA is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEP-PA.