Barclays PLC
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BCS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BCS
Barclays PLC (BCS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCS | $21.80 | -0.14% | 75.5B | 9.73 | $2.24 | +2.07% |
| JPM | $294.60 | -0.26% | 794.5B | 14.71 | $20.03 | +1.97% |
| JPM-PC | $25.04 | +0.00% | 790.4B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.97% |
| JPM-PD | $24.49 | +0.74% | 788.3B | 1.82 | $13.48 | +1.97% |
| BAC-PL | $1,180.00 | -0.01% | 443.8B | 335.80 | $3.51 | +2.23% |
| BAC | $49.38 | +0.22% | 354.4B | 12.96 | $3.81 | +2.23% |
| BAC-PB | $24.97 | +0.28% | 348.8B | 7.11 | $3.51 | +2.23% |
| BAC-PK | $24.54 | +0.45% | 347.4B | 6.98 | $3.51 | +2.23% |
| BML-PL | $19.56 | +0.20% | 331.4B | 5.57 | $3.51 | +2.23% |
| BML-PH | $19.32 | +0.78% | 325B | 5.50 | $3.51 | +2.23% |
Stock Comparison
BCS vs JPM Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 794.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM trades at $294.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 790.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PC's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PD Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 788.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PD trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PD's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 443.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PL trades at $1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 335.80. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PL's competition here
BCS vs BAC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 354.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PB Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PB's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PK Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PK trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PK's competition here
BCS vs BML-PL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BML-PL trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BML-PL's competition here
BCS vs BML-PH Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 325B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BML-PH trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BML-PH's competition here
BCS vs BML-PG Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 321.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BML-PG trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BML-PG's competition here
BCS vs BML-PJ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 319.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BML-PJ trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BML-PJ's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PE Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 311.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PE trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PE's competition here
BCS vs HSBC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 290.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while HSBC trades at $84.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check HSBC's competition here
BCS vs WFC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 248.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC trades at $80.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 238B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PL trades at $1,164.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 241.05. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PL's competition here
BCS vs RY Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while RY trades at $163.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check RY's competition here
BCS vs C Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while C trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas C's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check C's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PQ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
BCS vs MUFG Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 198.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while MUFG trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check MUFG's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PY Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PY trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PY's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PR Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PR's competition here
BCS vs SAN Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while SAN trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check SAN's competition here
BCS vs TD Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while TD trades at $95.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check TD's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PM Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PM trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PM's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PN Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PN trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PN's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PS Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PS trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PS's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PO Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PO trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PO's competition here
BCS vs BBVA Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BBVA trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BBVA's competition here
BCS vs UBS Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while UBS trades at $39.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check UBS's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PQ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
BCS vs C-PJ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check C-PJ's competition here
BCS vs BAC-PP Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BAC-PP trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BAC-PP's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PC trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PC's competition here
BCS vs RY-PT Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check RY-PT's competition here
BCS vs BMO Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BMO trades at $136.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BMO's competition here
BCS vs CM Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while CM trades at $96.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check CM's competition here
BCS vs BNS Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while BNS trades at $70.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check BNS's competition here
BCS vs SMFG Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while SMFG trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check SMFG's competition here
BCS vs ING Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while ING trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check ING's competition here
BCS vs NU Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while NU trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check NU's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PZ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PA Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PA trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PA's competition here
BCS vs WFC-PD Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WFC-PD trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WFC-PD's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PJ Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PL trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PL's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PK Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PK trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PK's competition here
BCS vs C-PK Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check C-PK's competition here
BCS vs JPM-PM Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while JPM-PM trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check JPM-PM's competition here
BCS vs NWG Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while NWG trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check NWG's competition here
BCS vs EWBC Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while EWBC trades at $108.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check EWBC's competition here
BCS vs CS Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check CS's competition here
BCS vs NTB Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while NTB trades at $53.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check NTB's competition here
BCS vs TANNL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check TANNL's competition here
BCS vs FRC-PL Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check FRC-PL's competition here
BCS vs WBK Comparison April 2026
BCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCS stands at 75.5B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BCS is priced at $21.80, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BCS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCS is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCS.Check WBK's competition here